On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Michael Scherer <mscherer at redhat.com> wrote:> Le vendredi 01 septembre 2017 ? 14:02 +0100, Michael Scherer a ?crit : >> Le mercredi 30 ao?t 2017 ? 12:11 +0530, Nigel Babu a ?crit : >> > Hello, >> > >> > To reduce confusion, we've setup docs.gluster.org pointing to >> > gluster.readthedocs.org. Both URLs will continue to work for the >> > forseeable >> > future. >> > >> > Please update any references that you control to point to >> > docs.gluster.org. At >> > some point in the distant future, we will switch to hosting >> > docs.gluster.org on >> > our own servers. >> > >> > RTD will set up a canonical link to docs.gluster.org[1]. Over time, >> > this will >> > change update the results on search engines to docs.gluster.org. >> > This >> > change >> > will reduce confusion we've had with copies of our docs hosted on >> > RTD. >> > >> > [1]: https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/canonical.html >> >> So , seems TLS certificate is wrong, should we correct the link to be >> http for now ? > > So I opened a few PR/review: > https://github.com/gluster/glusterdocs/pull/259 > > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18182/ > > https://github.com/gluster/glusterweb/pull/148 > > > -- > Michael Scherer > Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel at gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-develFair warning, glusterweb is now deprecated as discussed in Community Meeting on 30 Aug. However, github.com/gluster/glusterweb will be used as a bug tracker moving forward. This requested change in Glusterweb will be changed on the new main site that combines www and blog, I'll be putting out a call for volunteers who would like to be involved with the website before the next community meeting. -- Amye Scavarda | amye at redhat.com | Gluster Community Lead
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 06:21:38PM -0400, Amye Scavarda wrote:> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Michael Scherer <mscherer at redhat.com> wrote: > > Le vendredi 01 septembre 2017 ? 14:02 +0100, Michael Scherer a ?crit : > >> Le mercredi 30 ao?t 2017 ? 12:11 +0530, Nigel Babu a ?crit : > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > To reduce confusion, we've setup docs.gluster.org pointing to > >> > gluster.readthedocs.org. Both URLs will continue to work for the > >> > forseeable > >> > future. > >> > > >> > Please update any references that you control to point to > >> > docs.gluster.org. At > >> > some point in the distant future, we will switch to hosting > >> > docs.gluster.org on > >> > our own servers. > >> > > >> > RTD will set up a canonical link to docs.gluster.org[1]. Over time, > >> > this will > >> > change update the results on search engines to docs.gluster.org. > >> > This > >> > change > >> > will reduce confusion we've had with copies of our docs hosted on > >> > RTD. > >> > > >> > [1]: https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/canonical.html > >> > >> So , seems TLS certificate is wrong, should we correct the link to be > >> http for now ? > > > > So I opened a few PR/review: > > https://github.com/gluster/glusterdocs/pull/259 > > > > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18182/ > > > > https://github.com/gluster/glusterweb/pull/148 > > > > > > -- > > Michael Scherer > > Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > Gluster-devel at gluster.org > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > Fair warning, glusterweb is now deprecated as discussed in Community > Meeting on 30 Aug. However, github.com/gluster/glusterweb will be used > as a bug tracker moving forward.Could you please replace the contents of the current glusterweb repository with a README explaining this? The old files can stay in the history so that we can reference them in case something on the new website needs to be re-added. Being able to send pull requests and get contributions from users that way was one of the main reasons to move to GitHub. Is that still possible with the new site, in a different repository? I guess WordPress has some import/export features, but I don't know if those can get nicely combined with a repository on GitHub. Thanks! Niels
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 06:21:38PM -0400, Amye Scavarda wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Michael Scherer <mscherer at redhat.com> wrote: >> > Le vendredi 01 septembre 2017 ? 14:02 +0100, Michael Scherer a ?crit : >> >> Le mercredi 30 ao?t 2017 ? 12:11 +0530, Nigel Babu a ?crit : >> >> > Hello, >> >> > >> >> > To reduce confusion, we've setup docs.gluster.org pointing to >> >> > gluster.readthedocs.org. Both URLs will continue to work for the >> >> > forseeable >> >> > future. >> >> > >> >> > Please update any references that you control to point to >> >> > docs.gluster.org. At >> >> > some point in the distant future, we will switch to hosting >> >> > docs.gluster.org on >> >> > our own servers. >> >> > >> >> > RTD will set up a canonical link to docs.gluster.org[1]. Over time, >> >> > this will >> >> > change update the results on search engines to docs.gluster.org. >> >> > This >> >> > change >> >> > will reduce confusion we've had with copies of our docs hosted on >> >> > RTD. >> >> > >> >> > [1]: https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/canonical.html >> >> >> >> So , seems TLS certificate is wrong, should we correct the link to be >> >> http for now ? >> > >> > So I opened a few PR/review: >> > https://github.com/gluster/glusterdocs/pull/259 >> > >> > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18182/ >> > >> > https://github.com/gluster/glusterweb/pull/148 >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Michael Scherer >> > Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Gluster-devel mailing list >> > Gluster-devel at gluster.org >> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> >> Fair warning, glusterweb is now deprecated as discussed in Community >> Meeting on 30 Aug. However, github.com/gluster/glusterweb will be used >> as a bug tracker moving forward. > > Could you please replace the contents of the current glusterweb > repository with a README explaining this? The old files can stay in the > history so that we can reference them in case something on the new > website needs to be re-added. > > Being able to send pull requests and get contributions from users that > way was one of the main reasons to move to GitHub. Is that still > possible with the new site, in a different repository? I guess WordPress > has some import/export features, but I don't know if those can get > nicely combined with a repository on GitHub. > > Thanks! > NielsSo we're actually going to move forward in a different direction with the glusterweb repository once we get everything cleaned up. We'll still use the GitHub issue queue as a method of tracking improvements/bugs/feature requests , but I'd like to get us to a place where we have a WordPress theme that people can contribute to and code for custom plugins that we've developed. I'll be looking for volunteers that can edit content directly as well. I'll create a branch outlining what that could look like and we'll discuss at the next community meeting. - amye -- Amye Scavarda | amye at redhat.com | Gluster Community Lead