thr3ads.net - Gluster users - [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs [Jul 2017]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Jo Goossens

2017-Jul-11 09:01 UTC

[Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs

Hello,

?
?
We tried tons of settings to get a php app running on a native gluster mount:

?
e.g.:?192.168.140.41:/www /var/www glusterfs
defaults,_netdev,backup-volfile-servers=192.168.140.42:192.168.140.43,direct-io-mode=disable
0 0

?
I tried some mount variants in order to speed up things without luck.

?
?
After that I tried nfs (native gluster nfs 3 and ganesha nfs 4), it was a crazy
performance difference.

?
e.g.:?192.168.140.41:/www /var/www nfs4 defaults,_netdev 0 0

?
I tried a test like this to confirm the slowness:

?
./smallfile_cli.py ?--top /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads 8
--files 5000 --file-size 64 --record-size 64
?This test finished in around 1.5 seconds with NFS and in more than 250 seconds
without nfs (can't remember exact numbers, but I reproduced it several times
for both).
?With the native gluster mount the php app had loading times of over 10 seconds,
with the nfs mount the php app loaded around 1 second maximum and even less.
(reproduced several times)
??I tried all kind of performance settings and variants of this but not helped ,
the difference stayed huge, here are some of the settings played with in random
order:

?
gluster volume set www features.cache-invalidation on
gluster volume set www features.cache-invalidation-timeout 600
gluster volume set www performance.stat-prefetch on
gluster volume set www performance.cache-samba-metadata on
gluster volume set www performance.cache-invalidation on
gluster volume set www performance.md-cache-timeout 600
gluster volume set www network.inode-lru-limit 250000
?gluster volume set www performance.cache-refresh-timeout 60
gluster volume set www performance.read-ahead disable
gluster volume set www performance.readdir-ahead on
gluster volume set www performance.parallel-readdir on
gluster volume set www performance.write-behind-window-size 4MB
gluster volume set www performance.io-thread-count 64
?gluster volume set www performance.client-io-threads on
?gluster volume set www performance.cache-size 1GB
gluster volume set www performance.quick-read on
gluster volume set www performance.flush-behind on
gluster volume set www performance.write-behind on
gluster volume set www nfs.disable on
?gluster volume set www client.event-threads 3
gluster volume set www server.event-threads 3
??
?
The NFS ha adds a lot of complexity which we wouldn't need at all in our
setup, could you please explain what is going on here? Is NFS the only solution
to get acceptable performance? Did I miss one crucial settting perhaps?

?
We're really desperate, thanks a lot for your help!

?
?
PS: We tried with gluster 3.11 and 3.8 on Debian, both had terrible performance
when not used with nfs.

?
?


Kind regards

Jo Goossens

?
?
?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170711/bb661c4c/attachment.html>

Soumya Koduri

2017-Jul-11 09:16 UTC

head link

[Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs

+ Ambarish

On 07/11/2017 02:31 PM, Jo Goossens wrote:> Hello,
>
>
>
>
>
> We tried tons of settings to get a php app running on a native gluster
> mount:
>
>
>
> e.g.: 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www glusterfs
>
defaults,_netdev,backup-volfile-servers=192.168.140.42:192.168.140.43,direct-io-mode=disable
> 0 0
>
>
>
> I tried some mount variants in order to speed up things without luck.
>
>
>
>
>
> After that I tried nfs (native gluster nfs 3 and ganesha nfs 4), it was
> a crazy performance difference.
>
>
>
> e.g.: 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www nfs4 defaults,_netdev 0 0
>
>
>
> I tried a test like this to confirm the slowness:
>
>
>
> ./smallfile_cli.py  --top /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41
> --threads 8 --files 5000 --file-size 64 --record-size 64
>
> This test finished in around 1.5 seconds with NFS and in more than 250
> seconds without nfs (can't remember exact numbers, but I reproduced it
> several times for both).
>
> With the native gluster mount the php app had loading times of over 10
> seconds, with the nfs mount the php app loaded around 1 second maximum
> and even less. (reproduced several times)
>
>
>
> I tried all kind of performance settings and variants of this but not
> helped , the difference stayed huge, here are some of the settings
> played with in random order:
>
Request Ambarish & Karan (cc'ed who have been working on evaluating 
performance of various access protocols gluster supports) to look at the 
below settings and provide inputs.

Thanks,
Soumya
>
>
> gluster volume set www features.cache-invalidation on
> gluster volume set www features.cache-invalidation-timeout 600
> gluster volume set www performance.stat-prefetch on
> gluster volume set www performance.cache-samba-metadata on
> gluster volume set www performance.cache-invalidation on
> gluster volume set www performance.md-cache-timeout 600
> gluster volume set www network.inode-lru-limit 250000
>
> gluster volume set www performance.cache-refresh-timeout 60
> gluster volume set www performance.read-ahead disable
> gluster volume set www performance.readdir-ahead on
> gluster volume set www performance.parallel-readdir on
> gluster volume set www performance.write-behind-window-size 4MB
> gluster volume set www performance.io-thread-count 64
>
> gluster volume set www performance.client-io-threads on
>
> gluster volume set www performance.cache-size 1GB
> gluster volume set www performance.quick-read on
> gluster volume set www performance.flush-behind on
> gluster volume set www performance.write-behind on
> gluster volume set www nfs.disable on
>
> gluster volume set www client.event-threads 3
> gluster volume set www server.event-threads 3
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The NFS ha adds a lot of complexity which we wouldn't need at all in
our
> setup, could you please explain what is going on here? Is NFS the only
> solution to get acceptable performance? Did I miss one crucial settting
> perhaps?
>
>
>
> We're really desperate, thanks a lot for your help!
>
>
>
>
>
> PS: We tried with gluster 3.11 and 3.8 on Debian, both had terrible
> performance when not used with nfs.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Jo Goossens
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>

Jo Goossens

2017-Jul-11 09:26 UTC

head link

[Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs

Hi all,

?
?
One more thing, we have 3 apps servers with the gluster on it, replicated on 3
different gluster nodes. (So the gluster nodes are app servers at the same
time). We could actually almost work locally if we wouldn't need to have the
same files on the 3 nodes and redundancy :)

?
Initial cluster was created like this:

?
gluster volume create www replica 3 transport tcp 192.168.140.41:/gluster/www
192.168.140.42:/gluster/www 192.168.140.43:/gluster/www force
gluster volume set www network.ping-timeout 5
gluster volume set www performance.cache-size 1024MB
gluster volume set www nfs.disable on # No need for NFS currently
gluster volume start www
?To my understanding it still wouldn't explain why nfs has such great
performance compared to native ...
??
Regards

Jo

?

?
-----Original message-----
From:Soumya Koduri <skoduri at redhat.com>
Sent:Tue 11-07-2017 11:16
Subject:Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs
To:Jo Goossens <jo.goossens at hosted-power.com>; gluster-users at
gluster.org;
CC:Ambarish Soman <asoman at redhat.com>; Karan Sandha <ksandha at
redhat.com>;
+ Ambarish

On 07/11/2017 02:31 PM, Jo Goossens wrote:> Hello,
>
>
>
>
>
> We tried tons of settings to get a php app running on a native gluster
> mount:
>
>
>
> e.g.: 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www glusterfs
>
defaults,_netdev,backup-volfile-servers=192.168.140.42:192.168.140.43,direct-io-mode=disable
> 0 0
>
>
>
> I tried some mount variants in order to speed up things without luck.
>
>
>
>
>
> After that I tried nfs (native gluster nfs 3 and ganesha nfs 4), it was
> a crazy performance difference.
>
>
>
> e.g.: 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www nfs4 defaults,_netdev 0 0
>
>
>
> I tried a test like this to confirm the slowness:
>
>
>
> ./smallfile_cli.py ?--top /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41
> --threads 8 --files 5000 --file-size 64 --record-size 64
>
> This test finished in around 1.5 seconds with NFS and in more than 250
> seconds without nfs (can't remember exact numbers, but I reproduced it
> several times for both).
>
> With the native gluster mount the php app had loading times of over 10
> seconds, with the nfs mount the php app loaded around 1 second maximum
> and even less. (reproduced several times)
>
>
>
> I tried all kind of performance settings and variants of this but not
> helped , the difference stayed huge, here are some of the settings
> played with in random order:
>
Request Ambarish & Karan (cc'ed who have been working on evaluating 
performance of various access protocols gluster supports) to look at the 
below settings and provide inputs.

Thanks,
Soumya
>
>
> gluster volume set www features.cache-invalidation on
> gluster volume set www features.cache-invalidation-timeout 600
> gluster volume set www performance.stat-prefetch on
> gluster volume set www performance.cache-samba-metadata on
> gluster volume set www performance.cache-invalidation on
> gluster volume set www performance.md-cache-timeout 600
> gluster volume set www network.inode-lru-limit 250000
>
> gluster volume set www performance.cache-refresh-timeout 60
> gluster volume set www performance.read-ahead disable
> gluster volume set www performance.readdir-ahead on
> gluster volume set www performance.parallel-readdir on
> gluster volume set www performance.write-behind-window-size 4MB
> gluster volume set www performance.io-thread-count 64
>
> gluster volume set www performance.client-io-threads on
>
> gluster volume set www performance.cache-size 1GB
> gluster volume set www performance.quick-read on
> gluster volume set www performance.flush-behind on
> gluster volume set www performance.write-behind on
> gluster volume set www nfs.disable on
>
> gluster volume set www client.event-threads 3
> gluster volume set www server.event-threads 3
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The NFS ha adds a lot of complexity which we wouldn't need at all in
our
> setup, could you please explain what is going on here? Is NFS the only
> solution to get acceptable performance? Did I miss one crucial settting
> perhaps?
>
>
>
> We're really desperate, thanks a lot for your help!
>
>
>
>
>
> PS: We tried with gluster 3.11 and 3.8 on Debian, both had terrible
> performance when not used with nfs.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Jo Goossens
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170711/6374f3ee/attachment.html>

lemonnierk at ulrar.net

2017-Jul-11 15:02 UTC

head link

[Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs

Hi,

We've been doing that for some clients, basically it works fine if you
configure your OPCache very very agressivly. Increase the available ram
for it, disable any form of opcache validating from disk and it'll work
great, 'cause your app won't touch gluster.
Then whenever you make a change in the PHP, just restart PHP to force
it to reload the source from gluster.
For example :

zend_extension = opcache.so

[opcache]
opcache.enable = 1
opcache.enable_cli = 1
opcache.memory_consumption = 1024
opcache.max_accelerated_files = 80000
opcache.revalidate_freq = 300
opcache.validate_timestamps = 1
opcache.interned_strings_buffer = 32
opcache.fast_shutdown = 1

With that config, it works well. Needs some getting used to though, since
you'll need to restart php to see any change in the sources applied.

If you use something with an on-disk cache (Prestashop, magento, typo3 ..)
do think of storing that in a redis or something, never on gluster, that'd
kill performances. I've seen a gain of ~10 seconds by just moving the cache
from gluster to redis for Magento for example.


On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:01:52AM +0200, Jo Goossens
wrote:> Hello,
> 
> ?
> ?
> We tried tons of settings to get a php app running on a native gluster
mount:
> 
> ?
> e.g.:?192.168.140.41:/www /var/www glusterfs
defaults,_netdev,backup-volfile-servers=192.168.140.42:192.168.140.43,direct-io-mode=disable
0 0
> 
> ?
> I tried some mount variants in order to speed up things without luck.
> 
> ?
> ?
> After that I tried nfs (native gluster nfs 3 and ganesha nfs 4), it was a
crazy performance difference.
> 
> ?
> e.g.:?192.168.140.41:/www /var/www nfs4 defaults,_netdev 0 0
> 
> ?
> I tried a test like this to confirm the slowness:
> 
> ?
> ./smallfile_cli.py ?--top /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads
8 --files 5000 --file-size 64 --record-size 64
> ?This test finished in around 1.5 seconds with NFS and in more than 250
seconds without nfs (can't remember exact numbers, but I reproduced it
several times for both).
> ?With the native gluster mount the php app had loading times of over 10
seconds, with the nfs mount the php app loaded around 1 second maximum and even
less. (reproduced several times)
> ??I tried all kind of performance settings and variants of this but not
helped , the difference stayed huge, here are some of the settings played with
in random order:
> 
> ?
> gluster volume set www features.cache-invalidation on
> gluster volume set www features.cache-invalidation-timeout 600
> gluster volume set www performance.stat-prefetch on
> gluster volume set www performance.cache-samba-metadata on
> gluster volume set www performance.cache-invalidation on
> gluster volume set www performance.md-cache-timeout 600
> gluster volume set www network.inode-lru-limit 250000
> ?gluster volume set www performance.cache-refresh-timeout 60
> gluster volume set www performance.read-ahead disable
> gluster volume set www performance.readdir-ahead on
> gluster volume set www performance.parallel-readdir on
> gluster volume set www performance.write-behind-window-size 4MB
> gluster volume set www performance.io-thread-count 64
> ?gluster volume set www performance.client-io-threads on
> ?gluster volume set www performance.cache-size 1GB
> gluster volume set www performance.quick-read on
> gluster volume set www performance.flush-behind on
> gluster volume set www performance.write-behind on
> gluster volume set www nfs.disable on
> ?gluster volume set www client.event-threads 3
> gluster volume set www server.event-threads 3
> ??
> ?
> The NFS ha adds a lot of complexity which we wouldn't need at all in
our setup, could you please explain what is going on here? Is NFS the only
solution to get acceptable performance? Did I miss one crucial settting perhaps?
> 
> ?
> We're really desperate, thanks a lot for your help!
> 
> ?
> ?
> PS: We tried with gluster 3.11 and 3.8 on Debian, both had terrible
performance when not used with nfs.
> 
> ?
> ?
> 
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Jo Goossens
> 
> ?
> ?
> ?
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170711/3e2ce5d3/attachment.sig>

Reasonably Related Threads

Search for more maybe matching threads

Gluster users - Jul 2017 - Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs

[Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs

[Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs

[Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs

[Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs

Reasonably Related Threads