Gluster users - Jul 2016 - New cluster - first experience

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <
gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2016-07-11 19:31 GMT+02:00 Gandalf Corvotempesta
> <gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com>:
> > Each disks on each node is able to saturate the network, so I would
> > expect about 950mbit when writing in parallel to 3 nodes. I'm
reaching
> > 1/4 of available speed.
>
> I did more tests, even by transfering files with rsync i'm able to
> saturate the network.
> The only slow thing is gluster.
>
Did you try by chance running 3 transfers at once from one server to all 3
nodes outside of gluster?  Maybe bonding isn't picking alternate routes
like it would be expected.
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160712/0c085085/attachment.html>

2016-07-12 13:36 GMT+02:00 David Gossage <dgossage at
carouselchecks.com>:
> Did you try by chance running 3 transfers at once from one server to all 3
> nodes outside of gluster?  Maybe bonding isn't picking alternate routes
like
> it would be expected.
As wrote, currently i'm not using bonding but a single gigabit
connection and i'm still
unable to go over 1/4 of the theoretical speed.

1000/8/3 = 41MB/s

I'm stuck at 10MB/s