Gluster users - Nov 2014 - Glusterfs backlogs

Folks,

While I was looking into glusterd backlogs I could see there are few BZs
which were marked as "needinfo" on the reporter as the information was
not sufficient enough for further analysis and the reporter hasn't
gotten back with the required details.

Ideally we should close these bugs saying inadequate information,
however I am just wondering should we set a timeline for the waiting
period like 1 or 2 weeks if not more and then close all such instances
to reduce the count.

What do you guys think?

~Atin

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 04:31:38PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee
wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> While I was looking into glusterd backlogs I could see there are few BZs
> which were marked as "needinfo" on the reporter as the
information was
> not sufficient enough for further analysis and the reporter hasn't
> gotten back with the required details.
> 
> Ideally we should close these bugs saying inadequate information,
> however I am just wondering should we set a timeline for the waiting
> period like 1 or 2 weeks if not more and then close all such instances
> to reduce the count.
> 
> What do you guys think?
Sounds good to me. I do not care much about the 1 or 2 weeks, lets see
if others have an opinion about it.

When you have some reactions, could you add a paragraph to the Bug
Triage guidelines [1] about this? It would be good to have a link in
there that lists bugs in NEW status, have a NEEDINFO set and their last
update was X weeks ago.

Thanks,
Niels

1. http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Bug_triage
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20141113/6714555f/attachment.sig>

Hi Atin,

FMPOV, 2 weeks time looks to be good, at the same time, please give
importance for the product version it is reported. If they are into our
running stable or near versions, we can be some more flexible.

--Humble

--Humble


On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com>
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> While I was looking into glusterd backlogs I could see there are few BZs
> which were marked as "needinfo" on the reporter as the
information was
> not sufficient enough for further analysis and the reporter hasn't
> gotten back with the required details.
>
> Ideally we should close these bugs saying inadequate information,
> however I am just wondering should we set a timeline for the waiting
> period like 1 or 2 weeks if not more and then close all such instances
> to reduce the count.
>
> What do you guys think?
>
> ~Atin
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20141114/33a3caf4/attachment.html>