Is there a graceful way to kill a brick process? If we'd like to replace a disk on which a brick resides, we'd like to kill the brick process before replacing the disk. kill -9 does not seem to be a graceful way to do this. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20141111/514305ce/attachment.html>
Can you let us know why do you need to explicitly kill the brick process? replace-brick ideally does the same and spawns a new process. ~Atin On 11/11/2014 12:37 PM, Raghuram BK wrote:> f we'd like to replace a disk on which a brick resides