> On 18 Aug 2020, at 11:29, O'Connor, Daniel <darius at dons.net.au> wrote: > I think it would make sense to patch the port to add another stanza which matches EFISYS as well as EFI. > > What do you think?I was going to file a bug but bugzilla is having a nap right now. This patch works for me: [midget 12:47] /tmp/hal >cat files/patch-fdi_policy_10osvendor_20-storage-methods.fdi --- fdi/policy/10osvendor/20-storage-methods.fdi.orig 2020-08-18 12:41:54.869810000 +0930 +++ fdi/policy/10osvendor/20-storage-methods.fdi 2020-08-18 12:42:14.480922000 +0930 @@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ <match key="volume.label" string="EFI"> <merge key="volume.ignore" type="bool">true</merge> </match> + <match key="volume.label" string="EFISYS"> + <merge key="volume.ignore" type="bool">true</merge> + </match> </match> <match key="volume.fstype" string_outof="ntfs;vfat"> -- Daniel O'Connor "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum
On 18/08/20 05:23, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:> > >> On 18 Aug 2020, at 11:29, O'Connor, Daniel <darius at dons.net.au> wrote: >> I think it would make sense to patch the port to add another stanza which matches EFISYS as well as EFI. >> >> What do you think? > > I was going to file a bug but bugzilla is having a nap right now.I agree with the suggestion. I'm not an expert about hal though. If anyone has links to good documentation that would also be great. Anyway this requires some coordination with gnome, which maintains the port. -- Guido Falsi <mad at madpilot.net>