freebsd stable - Jul 2015 - Will 10.2 also ship with a very stale NTP?

On 2015-Jul-11 23:22:56 -0400, Chris Nehren <cnehren+freebsd-stable at
pobox.com> wrote:
>On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 09:58:11 +1000, John Marshall wrote:
>> It's me again with my annual NTP whinge.
>
>The answer to the perennial "will release $foo ship with old / insecure
>/ otherwise deficient $bar?" is still "install $bar from
ports".
That's a non-answer.  It just changes the question to "why bother to
include $bar in base when I need to install the port anyway".

-- 
Peter Jeremy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20150712/829a109b/attachment.bin>

As I already mentioned in another post, head has 4.2.8 p3 in-tree.

So the answer should be MFC before creation of releng/10.2 is planned
or not.


On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 15:04:43 +1000
Peter Jeremy <peter at rulingia.com> wrote:
> On 2015-Jul-11 23:22:56 -0400, Chris Nehren <cnehren+freebsd-stable at
pobox.com> wrote:
> >On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 09:58:11 +1000, John Marshall wrote:
> >> It's me again with my annual NTP whinge.
> >
> >The answer to the perennial "will release $foo ship with old /
insecure
> >/ otherwise deficient $bar?" is still "install $bar from
ports".
> 
> That's a non-answer.  It just changes the question to "why bother
to
> include $bar in base when I need to install the port anyway".
> 
> -- 
> Peter Jeremy

-- 
Tomoaki AOKI    junchoon at dec.sakura.ne.jp