On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 09:58:11 +1000, John Marshall wrote:> It's me again with my annual NTP whinge.The answer to the perennial "will release $foo ship with old / insecure / otherwise deficient $bar?" is still "install $bar from ports". -- Chris Nehren
On 2015-Jul-11 23:22:56 -0400, Chris Nehren <cnehren+freebsd-stable at pobox.com> wrote:>On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 09:58:11 +1000, John Marshall wrote: >> It's me again with my annual NTP whinge. > >The answer to the perennial "will release $foo ship with old / insecure >/ otherwise deficient $bar?" is still "install $bar from ports".That's a non-answer. It just changes the question to "why bother to include $bar in base when I need to install the port anyway". -- Peter Jeremy -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 949 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20150712/829a109b/attachment.bin>
On Jul 11 23:22, Chris Nehren wrote:>On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 09:58:11 +1000, John Marshall wrote: >> It's me again with my annual NTP whinge. > >The answer to the perennial "will release $foo ship with old / insecure >/ otherwise deficient $bar?" is still "install $bar from ports". >I completely agree with this, however my NTP whinge is that the NTP port needs to have its own RC init script that is independant of the base. If you use WITHOUT_NTP=yes in /etc/src.conf to remove the base version and just use the port then there is no RC script. You have to copy the version from /usr/src/etc/rc.d/ntp into /usr/local/etc/rc.d. This should be fixed. I guess this wouldn't be too difficult to do. I said six months ago that I might look at submitting a patch to do this, maybe I should actually do it. -- Matt