Didier Eggerickx
2006-Nov-15 09:32 UTC
[Flac] Re: James Chapman FLAC 1.1.2 File Filter for Cool Edit Pro 2
Hello,
Different how? When displaying the wave in Cool Edit (it's to say, the FLAC
file itself is opened and decoded through the Chapman filter), the audio
wave result shows little differences : changes in frequencies at a given
time, lower or higher; not many changes, but changes! I attribute this to
the filter, because when decoding with your soft, already used for encoding,
no problem at all, the two waves are exactly identical, in Cool Edit, and
with a binary comparison tool like Windiff, Dos FC, or so...no difference at
all!!
Can you confirm this?
Didier
----- Original Message -----
From: <flac-request@xiph.org>
To: <flac@xiph.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 9:00 PM
Subject: Flac Digest, Vol 26, Issue 7
Send Flac mailing list submissions to
flac@xiph.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
flac-request@xiph.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
flac-owner@xiph.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Flac digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: James Chapman Flac 1.1.2 File Filter for Cool Edit Pro v2
(Josh Coalson)
2. Re: flac files (Richard)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:22:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Flac] James Chapman Flac 1.1.2 File Filter for Cool Edit
Pro v2
To: Didier Eggerickx <didier.eggerickx@skynet.be>, flac@xiph.org
Message-ID: <452518.89795.qm@web60418.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
--- Didier Eggerickx <didier.eggerickx@skynet.be>
wrote:> Hello,
>
> Parano?ac? Maybe... When encoding my files in FLAC, and using the
> Verify option, I do a final test with Cool Edit Pro v2.0, which used
> a flac.flt file created by James Chapman for Flac v 1.1.2.
> The problem is that, when decoding a Flac file with the Josh Coalson
> soft, I obtain the same file, in content in size than the original
> WAV file, but when opening the FLAC file in Cool Edit (using thus
> this file filter), the result is most of the time a little different
> than the WAV (original or decoded) file. I say "most of the time"
> because in two cases, it was also exactly the same. How can you
> explain that?
> I have the same problem with MP3, but MP3 is lossy, and I don't know
> on which version of which encoder it is based, so, in this case, it's
> more understanding...
> Thanks for your answer,
different how? see also
http://flac.sourceforge.net/faq.html#tools__wave_flac_wave
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:06:20 -0500
From: Richard <cms01@tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [Flac] flac files
To: Mark Rudholm <rudholm@hyperreal.org>, flac@xiph.org
Message-ID: <200611132206.20717.cms01@tampabay.rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
simple, not everyone has a ipod of sorts...
and some of my friends just have a cd player..
that can play mp3 but not flac or ogg files..
Rich
On Monday 13 November 2006 2:27 pm, you wrote:> Now that that's hopefully clear, my question would be
> "why do you want to do this?" Since CD-ROM discs aren't
> very capacious and FLAC tends to yield only about a 2:1
> compression ratio, it only halves the number of discs you'd
> have to carry around. Players with internal disk or flash
> memory can hold data equivalent to up to 100 CD-ROMs and
> are far smaller than any CD player.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Flac mailing list
Flac@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
End of Flac Digest, Vol 26, Issue 7
***********************************
Josh Coalson
2006-Nov-15 17:56 UTC
[Flac] Re: James Chapman FLAC 1.1.2 File Filter for Cool Edit Pro 2
I've never used it so I don't know... --- Didier Eggerickx <didier.eggerickx@skynet.be> wrote:> Hello, > > Different how? When displaying the wave in Cool Edit (it's to say, > the FLAC > file itself is opened and decoded through the Chapman filter), the > audio > wave result shows little differences : changes in frequencies at a > given > time, lower or higher; not many changes, but changes! I attribute > this to > the filter, because when decoding with your soft, already used for > encoding, > no problem at all, the two waves are exactly identical, in Cool Edit, > and > with a binary comparison tool like Windiff, Dos FC, or so...no > difference at > all!! > Can you confirm this? > > Didier > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <flac-request@xiph.org> > To: <flac@xiph.org> > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 9:00 PM > Subject: Flac Digest, Vol 26, Issue 7 > > > Send Flac mailing list submissions to > flac@xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > flac-request@xiph.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > flac-owner@xiph.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Flac digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: James Chapman Flac 1.1.2 File Filter for Cool Edit Pro v2 > (Josh Coalson) > 2. Re: flac files (Richard) > > >----------------------------------------------------------------------> > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:22:45 -0800 (PST) > From: Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [Flac] James Chapman Flac 1.1.2 File Filter for Cool > Edit > Pro v2 > To: Didier Eggerickx <didier.eggerickx@skynet.be>, flac@xiph.org > Message-ID: <452518.89795.qm@web60418.mail.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > --- Didier Eggerickx <didier.eggerickx@skynet.be> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Parano?ac? Maybe... When encoding my files in FLAC, and using the > > Verify option, I do a final test with Cool Edit Pro v2.0, which > used > > a flac.flt file created by James Chapman for Flac v 1.1.2. > > The problem is that, when decoding a Flac file with the Josh > Coalson > > soft, I obtain the same file, in content in size than the original > > WAV file, but when opening the FLAC file in Cool Edit (using thus > > this file filter), the result is most of the time a little > different > > than the WAV (original or decoded) file. I say "most of the time" > > because in two cases, it was also exactly the same. How can you > > explain that? > > I have the same problem with MP3, but MP3 is lossy, and I don't > know > > on which version of which encoder it is based, so, in this case, > it's > > more understanding... > > Thanks for your answer, > > different how? see also > http://flac.sourceforge.net/faq.html#tools__wave_flac_wave > > > > >____________________________________________________________________________________> Do you Yahoo!? > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. > http://new.mail.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:06:20 -0500 > From: Richard <cms01@tampabay.rr.com> > Subject: Re: [Flac] flac files > To: Mark Rudholm <rudholm@hyperreal.org>, flac@xiph.org > Message-ID: <200611132206.20717.cms01@tampabay.rr.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > simple, not everyone has a ipod of sorts... > and some of my friends just have a cd player.. > that can play mp3 but not flac or ogg files.. > > > Rich > > > On Monday 13 November 2006 2:27 pm, you wrote: > > Now that that's hopefully clear, my question would be > > "why do you want to do this?" Since CD-ROM discs aren't > > very capacious and FLAC tends to yield only about a 2:1 > > compression ratio, it only halves the number of discs you'd > > have to carry around. Players with internal disk or flash > > memory can hold data equivalent to up to 100 CD-ROMs and > > are far smaller than any CD player. > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Flac mailing list > Flac@xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac > > > End of Flac Digest, Vol 26, Issue 7 > *********************************** > > > _______________________________________________ > Flac mailing list > Flac@xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac >____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link Don't quit your job - take classes online www.Classesusa.com