David W. Tamkin
2004-Sep-10 16:47 UTC
[Flac-users] Re: settings for tighter compression than -8?
Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > Ok, you need 0.04% improvement, that should not be a problem. Perhaps a little more than that, since the sizes I listed were after stripping out the padding and all metadata blocks except SEEKTABLE and STREAMINFO. > Try flac --lax -e -p -l 32 -r 10 --no-padding > and if it is not enough, increase -r up to 16. Thank you. I'll do that. What, though, are the "non-Subset files" that the description of the --lax option allows?
Josh explained, > search for "subset" on http://flac.sf.net/format.html > (I'll make a link in the documentation to it). That was over my head -- not the post, but the information at that URL. Does it mean that a non-Subset FLAC file isn't streamable, that a decoder can't read successive parts of the FLAC file and generate successive parts of the WAV?
Josh Coalson
2004-Sep-10 16:47 UTC
[Flac-users] Re: settings for tighter compression than -8?
--- "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@panix.com> wrote:> What, though, are the "non-Subset files" that > the description of the --lax option allows?search for "subset" on http://flac.sf.net/format.html (I'll make a link in the documentation to it). Josh __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more http://tax.yahoo.com