Here's the patch submit message for 4GB+ windows barrier.
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail//flac-dev/2013-March/003804.html
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:00 PM, <flac-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote:
> Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to
> flac-dev at xiph.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> flac-dev-request at xiph.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> flac-dev-owner at xiph.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of flac-dev digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: (no subject) (Erik de Castro Lopo)
> 2. Question from Argentina (Federico Miyara)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com>
> To: flac-dev at xiph.org
> Cc:
> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:52:38 +1000
> Subject: Re: [flac-dev] (no subject)
> Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
>
> > On 10.6.2013 22:27, Marcus Johnson wrote:
> > > Also, shouldn't the changelog feature the 4GB windows fix? I
remember
> > > reading about that bug fix at the start of 1.3.0, and I for one
was
> > > incredibly excited about it.
> > >
> > > if nobody remembers it I can try to hunt down that patch on the
mail
> list.
> > >
> >
> > IMO it should have been mentioned and I voiced my opinion about this
to
> > Eric on IRC before the official announcement.
> > At least it's mentioned in the news posting on Hydrogenaudio:
> > http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=101082
>
> If some provides the required text, I'm happy to update the changelog.
>
> Erik
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Erik de Castro Lopo
> http://www.mega-nerd.com/
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Federico Miyara <fmiyara at fceia.unr.edu.ar>
> To: flac-dev at xiph.org
> Cc:
> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:13:56 -0300
> Subject: [flac-dev] Question from Argentina
>
> Dear Friends,
>
> I am new to this mailing list. I am with the National University of
> Rosario, Argentina, and I am writing a book on software-based acoustical
> measurements, which includes a chapter on FLAC for archival and streaming
> purposes from an remote embedded system including a sensor.
>
> I would like to ask why the seekpoint information in the seek table
> metadata block reserves 64 bit for the number of first sample in target
> frame and for the offset of the first byte of target frame.
>
> It seems to me a lot, since 2^64 = 1.84e+19, i.e., far more samples and
> bytes than can be expected in any file... ever.
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Federico Miyara
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> flac-dev mailing list
> flac-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20130612/604c53b7/attachment.htm
