On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 05:28:39PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote:> which tests? for a little while there, test_seeking would fail > because of an intermittent bug in the seek routine which has been > fixed. test_flac and test_metaflac are currently failing because > of mismatches in the vendor string that I mentioned before.Ok, I updated to CVS as of this morning, and now only two of the tests failed. I didn't really investigate, but attaching build warning and 'make check' output logs for the record.> but it wouldn't surprise me if there are some 64 bit bugs still > since I don't have a machine to build on.There are a couple in the sourceforge.net compile farm, or I can give you an account on mine. Just send me an ssh public key. -r
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 05:38:09PM -0800, Ralph Giles wrote:> Ok, I updated to CVS as of this morning, and now only two of the tests > failed. I didn't really investigate, but attaching build warning and > 'make check' output logs for the record.Now with actually attachments... :P -r -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: make.warn.bz2 Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1396 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20061109/1ae62573/make.warn-0001.obj -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: make.check.bz2 Type: application/octet-stream Size: 157486 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20061109/1ae62573/make.check-0001.obj
--- Ralph Giles <giles@xiph.org> wrote:> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 05:28:39PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > which tests? for a little while there, test_seeking would fail > > because of an intermittent bug in the seek routine which has been > > fixed. test_flac and test_metaflac are currently failing because > > of mismatches in the vendor string that I mentioned before. > > Ok, I updated to CVS as of this morning, and now only two of the > tests > failed. I didn't really investigate, but attaching build warning and > 'make check' output logs for the record.ok, checked in some fixes that should take care of most of the warnings.> > but it wouldn't surprise me if there are some 64 bit bugs still > > since I don't have a machine to build on. > > There are a couple in the sourceforge.net compile farm, or I can give > you an account on mine. Just send me an ssh public key.oh yeah, will try the SF machines. Josh ____________________________________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 03:03:12PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote:> ok, checked in some fixes that should take care of most of the > warnings.Nice! Current complete set of warnings: replaygain.c: In function 'parse_double_': replaygain.c:612: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned replaygain.c:612: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression encode.c:2686: warning: 'limit_channel_mask' defined but not used There are lots of minor differences in the 'make check' output, but two tests still fail. -r