I was just trying to use acts_as_ferret with DRb and filter_proc,
without much success. My guess is that this isn''t possible because
there''s no way to send the proc to the DRb server, correct?
Person.find_by_contents("jonathan", :filter_proc => proc {}) causes
an
exception when using DRb (DRb::DRbConnError: DRb::DRbServerNotFound).
I can work around this by applying the filter after searching as the
exact number of results isn''t too important in this case.
Cheers,
-Jonathan
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 11:52:09AM +0200, Jonathan Viney wrote:> I was just trying to use acts_as_ferret with DRb and filter_proc, > without much success. My guess is that this isn''t possible because > there''s no way to send the proc to the DRb server, correct? > > Person.find_by_contents("jonathan", :filter_proc => proc {}) causes an > exception when using DRb (DRb::DRbConnError: DRb::DRbServerNotFound).afaik acts_as_ferret has no such option. But you''re right, Procs across DRb is not that easy, if possible at all. I don''t know what you want to do in that proc, maybe some simple active record conditions can do what you want? Jens -- Jens Kr?mer webit! Gesellschaft f?r neue Medien mbH Schnorrstra?e 76 | 01069 Dresden Telefon +49 351 46766-0 | Telefax +49 351 46766-66 kraemer at webit.de | www.webit.de Amtsgericht Dresden | HRB 15422 GF Sven Haubold, Hagen Malessa
Yes, it''s just a filter to remove people who shouldn''t be visible so I''ll use AR conditions. I guess it should be possible to use a filter with DRb, perhaps by just sending a code string that gets evaled by the DRb server. -Jonathan. Jens Kraemer wrote:> afaik acts_as_ferret has no such option. But you''re right, Procs across > DRb is not that easy, if possible at all. I don''t know what you want to > do in that proc, maybe some simple active record conditions can do what > you want? >-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.