Daniel Veillard
2009-Jan-09 14:10 UTC
[Fedora-xen] New Fedora virtualization list: fedora-virt
As the initiator for this list, I must admit I made a mistake 3 years ago, I should have picked a list name agnostic from the hypervisor name. With the current state of Xen in Fedora recent releases it really make sense to try to correct that mistake ... it''s never too late ! So https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt is born, I don''t want to mass-subscribe people, especially as I think the current list should survive with its Xen centric focus. You can subscribe directly to the new URL above. The topic is everything concerning Fedora and virtualization including Xen. I think the current list would be a good place for people still using Fedora <= 8 with Xen, but it''s just a suggestion :-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
Bill McGonigle
2009-Jan-09 17:48 UTC
Re: [Fedora-xen] New Fedora virtualization list: fedora-virt
On 2009-01-09 9:10 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:> I think the current list would be a good place for people > still using Fedora<= 8 with Xen, but it''s just a suggestion:-)Or in a couple months the people using Xen again with F10 (probably) right? If you had decided to change this list''s name I''d have had no objections. I can also subscribe to another list, make a new procmail rule, and dump the messages from both lists into the same folder, but it seems like a bunch of work replicated among n subscribers. Unless the goal is to keep down the noise from the Xen riff-raff for KVM folks. ;) Just for perspective, I''m interested in virtualization and Xen currently has the features I''m looking for; I''d guess other folks think similarly, but that''s an assumption. For instance, if KVM reached a state where it was a superset of Xen and had switch-worthy benefits that''s something I''d want to be reading about on this list. That''s all to say I''d vote not to have balkanized fedora virtualization lists; if I need to jump through a few mailman hoops that''s not a big deal even if it''s not ideal. -Bill -- Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440 BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668 bill@bfccomputing.com Cell: 603.252.2606 http://www.bfccomputing.com/ Page: 603.442.1833 Blog: http://blog.bfccomputing.com/ VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf
Daniel P. Berrange
2009-Jan-09 17:52 UTC
Re: [Fedora-xen] New Fedora virtualization list: fedora-virt
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 12:48:22PM -0500, Bill McGonigle wrote:> On 2009-01-09 9:10 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > I think the current list would be a good place for people > >still using Fedora<= 8 with Xen, but it''s just a suggestion:-) > > Or in a couple months the people using Xen again with F10 (probably) right?Depends if Dom0 patches are accepted into 2.6.29 kernel or not and then whether that kernel is stable enough for a F10 update...> If you had decided to change this list''s name I''d have had no > objections. I can also subscribe to another list, make a new procmail > rule, and dump the messages from both lists into the same folder, but it > seems like a bunch of work replicated among n subscribers. Unless the > goal is to keep down the noise from the Xen riff-raff for KVM folks. ;)Sadly changing mailing list names is effectively impossible with Mailman :-( Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
Dale Bewley
2009-Jan-10 18:49 UTC
Re: [Fedora-xen] New Fedora virtualization list: fedora-virt
On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 17:52 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:> Sadly changing mailing list names is effectively impossible with > Mailman :-(I''m not sure if it''s a good idea to rename a list with so many long referenced archived postings. If anything, perhaps the list should be deprecated or ignored until the Xen traffic on @fedora-virt becomes onerous (or not). Renaming a list is annoying, but mechanically not too hard. Here are my notes from the last time I successfully did it to a private list. I swapped in the fedora names for my names. I use postfix. cd /var/lib/mailman/lists mv fedora-xen fedora-virt cd /var/lib/mailman/archives/private mv fedora-xen fedora-virt mv fedora-xen.mbox fedora-virt.mbox mv fedora-virt.mbox/fedora-xen.mbox fedora-virt.mbox/fedora-virt.mbox /usr/lib/mailman/bin/arch fedora-virt cd /etc/mailman perl -pi -e ''s/fedora-xen/fedora-virt/g'' virtual-mailman postmap virtual-mailman perl -pi -e ''s/fedora-xen/fedora-virt/g'' aliases postalias aliases Login to http://hostname/mailman/admin/fedora-virt and change all occurrences of fedora-xen to fedora-virt. Changes made under General Options. http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/faq.html