Daryle A. Tilroe
2007-Jun-26 02:40 UTC
Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Problem with fds 1.0.4 on Red Hat 5 64 bits.
Rob Crittenden wrote:> Try the FC6 build instead. The problem is that RHEL4 uses Apache > 2.0.52 and RHEL 5 uses Apache 2.2.3. Their API''s are not completely > compatible and modules need to be recompiled.Just a quick followup on this. I am going to try it myself soon. Is the FC6 build actually the correct one or will there be a "proper" FDS 1.0.4 rpm for RHEL5 64bit at any point in the near future? -- Daryle A. Tilroe
Richard Megginson
2007-Jun-26 12:58 UTC
Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Problem with fds 1.0.4 on Red Hat 5 64 bits.
Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:> Rob Crittenden wrote: > >> Try the FC6 build instead. The problem is that RHEL4 uses Apache >> 2.0.52 and RHEL 5 uses Apache 2.2.3. Their API''s are not completely >> compatible and modules need to be recompiled. > > Just a quick followup on this. I am going to try it myself soon. > Is the FC6 build actually the correct oneYes.> or will there be a > "proper" FDS 1.0.4 rpm for RHEL5 64bit at any point in the near > future? >Probably only if there is some problem with the FC6 binary on RHEL5.
Daryle A. Tilroe
2007-Jun-26 14:30 UTC
Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Problem with fds 1.0.4 on Red Hat 5 64 bits.
Richard Megginson wrote:> Daryle A. Tilroe wrote: > >> Rob Crittenden wrote: >> >>> Try the FC6 build instead. The problem is that RHEL4 uses Apache >>> 2.0.52 and RHEL 5 uses Apache 2.2.3. Their API''s are not completely >>> compatible and modules need to be recompiled. >> >> Just a quick followup on this. I am going to try it myself soon. >> Is the FC6 build actually the correct one > > Yes. > >> or will there be a >> "proper" FDS 1.0.4 rpm for RHEL5 64bit at any point in the near >> future? >> > Probably only if there is some problem with the FC6 binary on RHEL5.Thanks for the clarification! I''ll be sure to give the community a shout if I find any issues. -- Daryle A. Tilroe