Fedora directory users - Jun 2007 - Re: Problem with fds 1.0.4 on Red Hat 5 64 bits.

Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Try the FC6 build instead. The problem is that RHEL4 uses Apache
> 2.0.52 and RHEL 5 uses Apache 2.2.3. Their API''s are not
completely
> compatible and modules need to be recompiled.
Just a quick followup on this.  I am going to try it myself soon.
Is the FC6 build actually the correct one or will there be a
"proper" FDS 1.0.4 rpm for RHEL5 64bit at any point in the near
future?

-- 
Daryle A. Tilroe

Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:
> Rob Crittenden wrote:
>
>> Try the FC6 build instead. The problem is that RHEL4 uses Apache
>> 2.0.52 and RHEL 5 uses Apache 2.2.3. Their API''s are not
completely
>> compatible and modules need to be recompiled.
>
> Just a quick followup on this.  I am going to try it myself soon.
> Is the FC6 build actually the correct one
Yes.
> or will there be a
> "proper" FDS 1.0.4 rpm for RHEL5 64bit at any point in the near
> future?
>
Probably only if there is some problem with the FC6 binary on RHEL5.

Richard Megginson wrote:
> Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:
> 
>> Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>
>>> Try the FC6 build instead. The problem is that RHEL4 uses Apache
>>> 2.0.52 and RHEL 5 uses Apache 2.2.3. Their API''s are not
completely
>>> compatible and modules need to be recompiled.
>>
>> Just a quick followup on this.  I am going to try it myself soon.
>> Is the FC6 build actually the correct one
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> or will there be a
>> "proper" FDS 1.0.4 rpm for RHEL5 64bit at any point in the
near
>> future?
>>
> Probably only if there is some problem with the FC6 binary on RHEL5.
Thanks for the clarification!  I''ll be sure to give the community
a shout if I find any issues.

-- 
Daryle A. Tilroe