Ext3 users - Jun 2005 - [Q] Is this true and does it mean there is dynamic defragmentation in ext2/3?

Someone recently posted the following statement midway down the page 
at 
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-305871-postdays-0-postorder-asc-highlight-ext3+ordered+data-start-25.html
>You don't need to defragment ext2/ext3 because as you use the 
>filesystem file blocks and inodes are moved around and reallocated 
>to keep the data nearly contiguous. It's not perfect, but it works 
>fairly well and you should almost never see a performance 
>degradation caused by the filesystem's fragmentation.
Is this statement accurate and does it mean ext2/3 is performing a 
sort of dynamic defragmentation?
-- 

Maurice Volaski, mvolaski at aecom.yu.edu
Computing Support, Rose F. Kennedy Center
Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 06:28:03PM -0400, Maurice Volaski
wrote:
> >You don't need to defragment ext2/ext3 because as you use the 
> >filesystem file blocks and inodes are moved around and reallocated 
> >to keep the data nearly contiguous. It's not perfect, but it works 
> >fairly well and you should almost never see a performance 
> >degradation caused by the filesystem's fragmentation.
> 
> Is this statement accurate and does it mean ext2/3 is performing a 
> sort of dynamic defragmentation?
No, not true.  (At least not today)

Ext2/3 has advanced algorithms to make sure that the blocks that are
allocated avoid fragmentation, but it is not doing any kind of dynamic
moving of blocks/inodes.  

(At least, not yet; there has been some talk about creating enough
kernel hooks so that a user-space program could do dynamic
defragmentation of the filesystem, but none of this exists at the
moment.)

						- Ted