search for: defragment

Two files in the different subvolumes may have the same inode id, so The rb-tree which is used to manage the defragment object must take it into account. This patch fix this problem. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/file.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c index 23...

While exploring some btrfs maintenance with respect to defragmenting I ran the following commands: # filefrag /path/to/34G.file /path/to/5.7G.file /path/to/34G.file: 2406 extents found /path/to/5.7G.file: 572 extents found Thinking those mostly static files could be less fragmented I ran: # btrfs filesystem defragment -c /path/to/34G.file # btrfs filesystem def...

...ommercial tool can not do almost no help for us. Anyone have any ideas on defraging ext3 file systems on-line? Thanks a lot. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following is the defragment reported by e2fsck.. arc158.example.com guolin 135% sudo e2fsck -f -n -d /dev/hda9 e2fsck 1.27 (8-Mar-2002) Warning! /dev/hda9 is mounted. Warning: skipping journal recovery because doing a read-only filesystem check. Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory structur...

...:11s >> >> I have tried different things to find out exactly what is the issue, >> but haven''t quite found it yet. > > If you''ve been using this volume for a while, it could just have become > badly fragmented. You could try btrfs''s fancy online defragmentation > abilities to see if that''ll give you an improvement: > > # btrfs filesystem defragment /mountpoint/of/volume > > Let us know if that helps, of course :) I finally managed to track down this issue. Indeed the fragmentation is horrible, and ''btrfs filesystem d...

Kernel 3.1-rc8 btrfs-progs-0.19 mount options: noatime,autodefrag (space_cache is enabled) There are snapshots present on the filesystem. When I do a btrfs fi defrag on a file, the file becomes much more fragmented. The end result can be a file with 20k times more fragments than before. Initially I thought the extents were just smaller but were next to each other, so I checked with both

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:12:58PM +0100, Olivier Hault wrote: > For a while, I wonder if it would be possible to defrag guest fs > from the host. I can see two flavors a) offline defrag, b) online > defrag of the guest fs > > I there already solutions of works in progress to support those > operations ? We don't support this right now. However it is certainly something we

Hi, first of all, apologies if this isn't the right mailing list but it was the best I could find. If you know a better mailing list, please tell me. Today I tried to defrag one of my filesystems. It's a 3.5T large filesystem that has 6 software-raids in the bottom and then merged together using lvm. I was running ext3 but removed the journal flag with thor:~# tune2fs -O ^has_journal

..._group(stru last_free_bits++; if (last_free_bits == move_len) { + i -= move_len; *goal_bit = i; *phys_cpos = base_cpos + i; break; @@ -1020,18 +1021,19 @@ int ocfs2_ioctl_move_extents(struct file context->range = &range; + /* + * ok, the default theshold for the defragmentation + * is 1M, since our maximum clustersize was 1M also. + * any thought? + */ + if (!range.me_threshold) + range.me_threshold = 1024 * 1024; + + if (range.me_threshold > i_size_read(inode)) + range.me_threshold = i_size_read(inode); + if (range.me_flags & OCFS2_MOVE_EXT_FL_AUTO_DEF...

...can only make use of 250GB of space, the other 250GB is going to be wasted. What I would propose to solve this is to implement a defrag / restripe utility as part of the raid-z upgrade process, making it a three step process: - New drive added to raid-z pool - Defrag tool begins restriping and defragmenting old data - Once restripe complete, pool reports the additional free space There are some limitations to this. You would maybe want to advise that expanding a raid-z pool should only be done with a reasonable amount of free disk space, and that it may take some time. It may also be beneficia...

Hello everybody, reading about the speed improvements possible with (on boot) preloaded files (which should be continuous on disk) I searched for a ext3 defrag program. I found an ext2 defrag program (http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/system/filesystems/defrag-0.70.tar.gz, available in debian as defrag) which would have an optimal feature (moving files by a list) but refuses to work on ext3.

..._group(stru last_free_bits++; if (last_free_bits == move_len) { + i -= move_len; *goal_bit = i; *phys_cpos = base_cpos + i; break; @@ -1020,18 +1021,19 @@ int ocfs2_ioctl_move_extents(struct file context->range = &range; + /* + * ok, the default theshold for the defragmentation + * is 1M, since our maximum clustersize was 1M also. + * any thought? + */ + if (!range.me_threshold) + range.me_threshold = 1024 * 1024; + + if (range.me_threshold > i_size_read(inode)) + range.me_threshold = i_size_read(inode); + if (range.me_flags & OCFS2_MOVE_EXT_FL_AUTO_DEF...

..._group(stru last_free_bits++; if (last_free_bits == move_len) { + i -= move_len; *goal_bit = i; *phys_cpos = base_cpos + i; break; @@ -1020,18 +1021,19 @@ int ocfs2_ioctl_move_extents(struct file context->range = &range; + /* + * ok, the default theshold for the defragmentation + * is 1M, since our maximum clustersize was 1M also. + * any thought? + */ + if (!range.me_threshold) + range.me_threshold = 1024 * 1024; + + if (range.me_threshold > i_size_read(inode)) + range.me_threshold = i_size_read(inode); + if (range.me_flags & OCFS2_MOVE_EXT_FL_AUTO_DEF...

..._group(stru last_free_bits++; if (last_free_bits == move_len) { + i -= move_len; *goal_bit = i; *phys_cpos = base_cpos + i; break; @@ -1020,18 +1021,19 @@ int ocfs2_ioctl_move_extents(struct file context->range = &range; + /* + * ok, the default theshold for the defragmentation + * is 1M, since our maximum clustersize was 1M also. + * any thought? + */ + if (!range.me_threshold) + range.me_threshold = 1024 * 1024; + + if (range.me_threshold > i_size_read(inode)) + range.me_threshold = i_size_read(inode); + if (range.me_flags & OCFS2_MOVE_EXT_FL_AUTO_DEF...

..._group(stru last_free_bits++; if (last_free_bits == move_len) { + i -= move_len; *goal_bit = i; *phys_cpos = base_cpos + i; break; @@ -1022,18 +1023,19 @@ int ocfs2_ioctl_move_extents(struct file context->range = &range; + /* + * ok, the default theshold for the defragmentation + * is 1M, since our maximum clustersize was 1M also. + * any thought? + */ + if (!range.me_threshold) + range.me_threshold = 1024 * 1024; + + if (range.me_threshold > i_size_read(inode)) + range.me_threshold = i_size_read(inode); + if (range.me_flags & OCFS2_MOVE_EXT_FL_AUTO_DEF...

..._group(stru last_free_bits++; if (last_free_bits == move_len) { + i -= move_len; *goal_bit = i; *phys_cpos = base_cpos + i; break; @@ -1030,18 +1031,19 @@ int ocfs2_ioctl_move_extents(struct file context->range = &range; + /* + * ok, the default theshold for the defragmentation + * is 1M, since our maximum clustersize was 1M also. + * any thought? + */ + if (!range.me_threshold) + range.me_threshold = 1024 * 1024; + + if (range.me_threshold > i_size_read(inode)) + range.me_threshold = i_size_read(inode); + if (range.me_flags & OCFS2_MOVE_EXT_FL_AUTO_DEF...

..._group(stru last_free_bits++; if (last_free_bits == move_len) { + i -= move_len; *goal_bit = i; *phys_cpos = base_cpos + i; break; @@ -1020,18 +1021,19 @@ int ocfs2_ioctl_move_extents(struct file context->range = &range; + /* + * ok, the default theshold for the defragmentation + * is 1M, since our maximum clustersize was 1M also. + * any thought? + */ + if (!range.me_threshold) + range.me_threshold = 1024 * 1024; + + if (range.me_threshold > i_size_read(inode)) + range.me_threshold = i_size_read(inode); + if (range.me_flags & OCFS2_MOVE_EXT_FL_AUTO_DEF...

- Add incompat flag, otherwise btrfs-progs will report error when operating on btrfs filesystems mounted with lzo option. - Allow to turn on lzo compression for defrag operation: # btrfs filesystem defragment -c[zlib, lzo] <file> Note: "-c zlib" will fail, because that''s how getopt() works for optional arguments. Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> --- The lzo patchset for kernel code can be found here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=12879906321512...

I set the C (NOCOW) and z (Not_Compressed) flags on a folder but the extent counts of files contained there keep increasing. Said files are large and frequently modified but not changing in size. This does not happen when the filesystem is mounted with nodatacow. I''m using this as a workaround since subvolumes can''t be mounted with different options simultaneously. ie. one with

...bits++; if (last_free_bits == move_len) { + i -= move_len; *goal_bit = i; *phys_cpos = base_cpos + i; break; @@ -1020,18 +1021,19 @@ int ocfs2_ioctl_move_extents(struct file *filp, void __user *argp) context->range = &range; + /* + * ok, the default theshold for the defragmentation + * is 1M, since our maximum clustersize was 1M also. + * any thought? + */ + if (!range.me_threshold) + range.me_threshold = 1024 * 1024; + + if (range.me_threshold > i_size_read(inode)) + range.me_threshold = i_size_read(inode); + if (range.me_flags & OCFS2_MOVE_EXT_FL_AUTO_DEF...

...xtent at ffffffffc139b2d2 [ocfs2] Analysis This bug has the same root cause of 'commit 7f27ec978b0e ("ocfs2: call ocfs2_journal_access_di() before ocfs2_journal_dirty() in ocfs2_write_end_nolock()")'. For this bug, jbd2_journal_restart() is called by ocfs2_split_extent() during defragmenting. How to fix For ocfs2_split_extent() can handle journal operations totally by itself. Caller doesn't need to call journal access/dirty pair, and caller only needs to call journal start/stop pair. The fix method is to remove journal access/dirty from __ocfs2_move_extent(). The discussion...