Hello all.
I'm using RedHat 7.2 now and haven't have any problems until today. I
can still boot into the system at this time, but cannot load X at all.
I'm getting the following error message when I try to run fsck.
/contains a file system with errors, check forced.
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks and sizes
Error reading block 1277964 (Attempt to read block from filesystem
resulted in a short read) while doing inode scan. Ignore error<y>?
No matter what I do (Y or N) the results are the same. The problem will
not go away. Does anyone have any ideas as to a fix, or to what the
problem is? When I do a fsck and it marks the fs as clean I reboot and
login the system. But I still cannot load xwindows.
below is some output from dmesg:
hdb: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hdb: dma_intr: error=0x10 { SectorIdNotFound }, LBAsect=81423,
sector=81360
hdb: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hdb: dma_intr: error=0x40 { UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=10223775,
sector=10223712
end_request: I/O error, dev 03:41 (hdb), sector 10223712
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,65)): ext3_get_inode_loc: unable to read
inode block - inode=636706, block=1277964
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,65)) in ext3_reserve_inode_write: IO
failure
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,65)) in ext3_new_inode: IO failure
hdb: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hdb: dma_intr: error=0x10 { SectorIdNotFound }, LBAsect=36264,
sector=36200
hdb: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hdb: dma_intr: error=0x10 { SectorIdNotFound }, LBAsect=3421247,
sector=3421184
hdb: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hdb: dma_intr: error=0x10 { SectorIdNotFound }, LBAsect=39183,
sector=39120
hdb: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hdb: dma_intr: error=0x10 { SectorIdNotFound }, LBAsect=39183,
sector=39120
hdb: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hdb: dma_intr: error=0x10 { SectorIdNotFound }, LBAsect=39280,
sector=39216
TIA
Louis
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 05:56:48PM -0800, Louis Hopcraft wrote:> No matter what I do (Y or N) the results are the same. The problem will > not go away. Does anyone have any ideas as to a fix, or to what the > problem is? When I do a fsck and it marks the fs as clean I reboot and > hdb: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } > hdb: dma_intr: error=0x10 { SectorIdNotFound }, LBAsect=81423,Your IDe drive is dying. backup immediately and try to get the warranty to apply. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
Hi, On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 05:56:48PM -0800, Louis Hopcraft wrote:> I'm using RedHat 7.2 now and haven't have any problems until today. I > can still boot into the system at this time, but cannot load X at all. > I'm getting the following error message when I try to run fsck. > > /contains a file system with errors, check forced. > Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks and sizes > Error reading block 1277964 (Attempt to read block from filesystem > resulted in a short read) while doing inode scan. Ignore error<y>?So fsck tried to read part of the filesystem and got an IO failure.> below is some output from dmesg: > > hdb: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } > hdb: dma_intr: error=0x10 { SectorIdNotFound }, LBAsect=81423, > sector=81360Messages coming back from the IDE driver indicating fatal media errors: you've got bad sectors on the disk.> end_request: I/O error, dev 03:41 (hdb), sector 10223712IDE passes the error back up to the filesystem...> EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,65)): ext3_get_inode_loc: unable to read > inode block - inode=636706, block=1277964 > EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,65)) in ext3_reserve_inode_write: IO > failure > EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,65)) in ext3_new_inode: IO failure... and the filesystem logs the failure and passes EIO back up to the calling application. The kernel is working exactly as expected in the presence of unrecoverable disk failure. Cheers, Stephen