-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 does this version need to be patched for any reason to handle/work with ext3? I found a patch for the previous release of util-linux, but it don't apply cleanly to this version. thanks! - -- Douglas J. Hunley (Linux User #174778) http://hunley.homeip.net/ http://linux.nf/ As a SysAdmin, yes, I CAN read your e-mail, but I DON'T get that bored! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjsk2rMACgkQOPP+k4ZeTm177gCdEnRSEq5Ap1f9m9u1bYORKVSm Sn4AoKOf90Q41Jf3sVnkG8yhSd9weW5F =YZCb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 10:50:26AM -0400, Douglas J. Hunley wrote:> does this version need to be patched for any reason to handle/work with ext3? > I found a patch for the previous release of util-linux, but it don't apply > cleanly to this version. thanks!I'm still using 2.10q without a hassle. You -will- need a recent version of ext2-utils for things like e2fsck and so on... -- CaT (cat@zip.com.au) *** Jenna has joined the channel. <cat> speaking of mental giants.. <Jenna> me, a giant, bullshit <Jenna> And i'm not mental - An IRC session, 20/12/2000
"Douglas J. Hunley" wrote:> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > does this version need to be patched for any reason to handle/work with ext3? > I found a patch for the previous release of util-linux, but it don't apply > cleanly to this version. thanks!No, it's not necessary. I've been playing with adding some ext3 conveniences to mount(8), but it's not fully worked out yet. Semi-unfortunatey, Andries applied some of my util-linux patches before I asked him to, and I haven't yet pulled down the latest version to see where we're up to.