Hi, For CAs that do not include a signed certificate timestamp in their newly-issued certificates, does Dovecot support either OCSP stapling or the Certificate Transparency TLS extension? If the TLS extension is supported, how does the admin configure the timestamp for each certificate? I?m wondering if any MUAs will follow Google?s lead and insist on CT. Thank you! -Felipe Gasper Mississauga, Ontario
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
On 01 May 2018 at 19:03 Felipe Gasper <
<a
href="mailto:felipe@felipegasper.com">felipe@felipegasper.com</a>>
wrote:
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Hi,
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
For CAs that do not include a signed certificate timestamp in their
newly-issued certificates, does Dovecot support either OCSP stapling or the
Certificate Transparency TLS extension?
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
If the TLS extension is supported, how does the admin configure the
timestamp for each certificate?
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
I’m wondering if any MUAs will follow Google’s lead and insist on CT.
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Thank you!
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
-Felipe Gasper
</div>
<div>
Mississauga, Ontario
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Hi!
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
We are planning to add ocsp stapling support. At least Thunderbird supports
must-staple attribute.
</div>
<div class="io-ox-signature">
---
<br>Aki Tuomi
</div>
</body>
</html>
On 05/01/2018 09:08 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:> >> On 01 May 2018 at 19:03 Felipe Gasper < felipe at felipegasper.com >> <mailto:felipe at felipegasper.com>> wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> For CAs that do not include a signed certificate timestamp in their >> newly-issued certificates, does Dovecot support either OCSP stapling >> or the Certificate Transparency TLS extension? >> >> If the TLS extension is supported, how does the admin configure the >> timestamp for each certificate? >> >> I?m wondering if any MUAs will follow Google?s lead and insist on CT. >> >> Thank you! >> >> -Felipe Gasper >> Mississauga, Ontario > > Hi! > > We are planning to add ocsp stapling support. At least Thunderbird > supports must-staple attribute. > --- > Aki TuomiHi, is there any more news on this? Note I don't *personally* need it, but I provide custom dovecot RPMs for CentOS 7 and someone asked how to do it. They want to use a certificate that has the "must staple" feature. (I'm personally more interested in DANE support in clients, which dovecot doesn't need to do anything for, that's client specific)