Someone, I don't remember whether it was Alex or Urban, asked me to check on my private keyfile to see if it began with "Begin RSA private key". I reported that it does not. Now here's where things get strange: When I ran the command: $ openssl req -nodes -newkey rsa:2048 -sha1 -keyout myserver.key -out server.csr on an old Ubuntu system, `myserver.key' does begin with "Begin RSA private key". But when I run that same command on a Fedora 20 system, the word "RSA" isn't there. Could this have anything to do with my 0906D06C error?
If I could remove this message from this list, I would! I just figured out what my problem was, and it's something I thought *FOR SURE* I had fixed. I've looked at this thing so many times, I fell into the trap of not seeing the forest for the trees. I had inadvertently omitted the '<' before the first certificate definition. I guess there really is something to the technique of walking away from a problem for a while--in this case, overnight--and then coming tack to it and seeing it as if for the first time. I am able to successfully connect via Telnet and will carry on with my testing and integration with Postfix. Thanks to all for their help.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 07:38:26AM -0400, Steve Matzura wrote:> If I could remove this message from this list, I would! I just figured > out what my problem was, and it's something I thought *FOR SURE* I had > fixed. I've looked at this thing so many times, I fell into the trap > of not seeing the forest for the trees. I had inadvertently omitted > the '<' before the first certificate definition. I guess there really > is something to the technique of walking away from a problem for a > while--in this case, overnight--and then coming tack to it and seeing > it as if for the first time. I am able to successfully connect via > Telnet and will carry on with my testing and integration with Postfix. > Thanks to all for their help.Suspense.. What was it (for future reference)? B
Am Montag, den 15.06.2015, 07:38 -0400 schrieb Steve Matzura:> If I could remove this message from this list, I would! I just figured > out what my problem was, and it's something I thought *FOR SURE* I had > fixed. I've looked at this thing so many times, I fell into the trap > of not seeing the forest for the trees. I had inadvertently omitted > the '<' before the first certificate definition. I guess there really > is something to the technique of walking away from a problem for a > while--in this case, overnight--and then coming tack to it and seeing > it as if for the first time. I am able to successfully connect via > Telnet and will carry on with my testing and integration with Postfix. > Thanks to all for their help.No need to. I'ts just another addition addition to a "knowledge" base, which might be helpful for someone else sometimes else. Congrats for your problem being solved and thanks for sharing it for further references. Regards, -M