Jeroen Massar
2015-Apr-10 09:59 UTC
Disabling of userdb/passdb modules using config statements
Hola, Debian (and possibly other distros) use the /etc/dovecot/conf.d/* setup where default config files are stuffed and then one can just add a 99-myconfig.conf et voila, variables are overruled. This allows the distro to supply updates to the files at package upgrade time without any/much user intervention. The problem (for me ;) is that the system comes provided with: auth-system.conf.ext containing: passdb { driver = pam } userdb { driver = passwd } Hence pam & /etc/passwd based are always enabled. This while I don't have any local users. Replication seems to then always pick up the local users, which are vmail + nobody (65536). doveadm user '*' thus reports vmail, nobody + virtual users Setting: first_valid_uid = 5000 last_valid_uid = 5000 only keeps vmail in there, but apparently some module (guess replication) is still able to figure out that 'nobody' exists: Apr 10 09:48:25 mail dovecot: doveadm(IPADDR,nobody): Error: Mail access for users with UID 65534 not permitted (see first_valid_uid in config file, uid from userdb lookup). Apr 10 09:48:25 mail dovecot: doveadm(IPADDR,nobody): Error: dsync-server: User init failed Apr 10 09:49:38 mail dovecot: doveadm(nobody): Error: sync: Failed to start remote dsync-server command: Remote exit_code=75 and on the other side: Apr 10 09:54:38 mail dovecot: doveadm(nobody): Error: sync: Unknown user in remote This can be resolved by commenting out the entries in auth-system.conf.ext but then I'll have to do that again at package upgrade time. Hence, would it be a cool option to be able (in the 99-myconfig.conf) file to put: passdb { driver = pam enabled = false } userdb { driver = passwd enabled = false } And thereby disabling those modules completely? Thus avoiding upgrade conflicts etc. Greets, Jeroen
On 04/10/2015 05:59 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:> > This can be resolved by commenting out the entries in > auth-system.conf.ext but then I'll have to do that again at package > upgrade time.Comment out the !include auth-system.conf.ext line in 10-auth.conf.> > Hence, would it be a cool option to be able (in the 99-myconfig.conf) > file to put:Actually you mean local.conf. See the master dovecont.conf file, it's included last.> > passdb { > driver = pam > enabled = false > } > userdb { > driver = passwd > enabled = false > } > > And thereby disabling those modules completely? Thus avoiding upgrade > conflicts etc.That's an interesting idea actually. My first thought is that it could be helpful to use *named* passdb / userdb sections to facilitate this.> > Greets, > Jeroen
Jeroen Massar
2015-Apr-10 10:27 UTC
Disabling of userdb/passdb modules using config statements
On 2015-04-10 12:16, Gedalya wrote:> On 04/10/2015 05:59 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote: >> >> This can be resolved by commenting out the entries in >> auth-system.conf.ext but then I'll have to do that again at package >> upgrade time. > > Comment out the !include auth-system.conf.ext line in 10-auth.conf.Though indeed simpler than commenting out multiple lines, that file also gets replaced by a package upgrade. Hence does not solve the 'can just upgrade silently' issue.>> Hence, would it be a cool option to be able (in the 99-myconfig.conf) >> file to put: > Actually you mean local.conf. See the master dovecont.conf file, it's > included last.Only when it exists, one can use both. from dovecot.conf: 8<------------- # Most of the actual configuration gets included below. The filenames are # first sorted by their ASCII value and parsed in that order. The 00-prefixes # in filenames are intended to make it easier to understand the ordering. !include conf.d/*.conf # A config file can also tried to be included without giving an error if # it's not found: !include_try local.conf --------------------------->8 Both conf.d/99-myconfig.conf and local.conf can work for this. I prefer 99- as that is what other daemons also use.>> >> passdb { >> driver = pam >> enabled = false >> } >> userdb { >> driver = passwd >> enabled = false >> } >> >> And thereby disabling those modules completely? Thus avoiding upgrade >> conflicts etc. > That's an interesting idea actually. My first thought is that it could > be helpful to use *named* passdb / userdb sections to facilitate this.That would require a default system, which now works out of the box with pam/etc to be properly named and then renamed... Greets, Jeroen
Steffen Kaiser
2015-Apr-13 13:25 UTC
Disabling of userdb/passdb modules using config statements
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 10 Apr 2015, Jeroen Massar wrote:> Debian (and possibly other distros) use the /etc/dovecot/conf.d/* setup > where default config files are stuffed and then one can just add a > 99-myconfig.conf et voila, variables are overruled.> This allows the distro to supply updates to the files at package upgrade > time without any/much user intervention. > > The problem (for me ;) is that the system comes provided with: > > auth-system.conf.ext containing: > > passdb { > driver = pam > } > userdb { > driver = passwd > } > > Hence pam & /etc/passwd based are always enabled. > This while I don't have any local users.Isn't that a packaging problem then? Debian should use DEBCONF to ask you while installation, which db to enable by default. You should file a bug with Debian to let the admin choose, which (if at all) db to enable by default. There are no config files installed by Dovecot, if compiled by source.> > Replication seems to then always pick up the local users, which are > vmail + nobody (65536). > > doveadm user '*' thus reports vmail, nobody + virtual users > > Setting: > first_valid_uid = 5000 > last_valid_uid = 5000 > > only keeps vmail in there, but apparently some module (guess > replication) is still able to figure out that 'nobody' exists: > > Apr 10 09:48:25 mail dovecot: doveadm(IPADDR,nobody): Error: Mail access > for users with UID 65534 not permitted (see first_valid_uid in config > file, uid from userdb lookup). > Apr 10 09:48:25 mail dovecot: doveadm(IPADDR,nobody): Error: > dsync-server: User init failed > Apr 10 09:49:38 mail dovecot: doveadm(nobody): Error: sync: Failed to > start remote dsync-server command: Remote exit_code=75 > > and on the other side: > Apr 10 09:54:38 mail dovecot: doveadm(nobody): Error: sync: Unknown user > in remote > > This can be resolved by commenting out the entries in > auth-system.conf.ext but then I'll have to do that again at package > upgrade time. > > Hence, would it be a cool option to be able (in the 99-myconfig.conf) > file to put: > > passdb { > driver = pam > enabled = false > } > userdb { > driver = passwd > enabled = false > } > > And thereby disabling those modules completely? Thus avoiding upgrade > conflicts etc. > > Greets, > Jeroen >- -- Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEVAwUBVSvDzHz1H7kL/d9rAQJybAgAyOmtGbDyp6nzR0IqK2RUTWTHtjkbcmrN G6MNxMCzsByp7JCCKaKZy4Ec9//4ua5+29zwsF4f/EjdyxOtCdZkOA2TRuw3Zbns nuECm4h03HsjkGIi216mMHP3z2QjqTuZNWFj0MppBuiBqSuNrNFfxQ0pac3xEeAo IYnKl1Oq4SKfwr351iF94NSHzCbR7CJDe5Q7TqkK8OB7PuASFIbYX9R6CYZc1jsR euLRHKssX7Brw44PkQGLjHEOBG8xWP4/cAVf4bApskSiW8q1IZWhMR7Z4rbUgxRY 3RInqI/rJ8azOjZWd8Us25eCJl3f30bFkdbmOlL6LlUkzPAjMPx/3A==MZqU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Maybe Matching Threads
- Disabling of userdb/passdb modules using config statements
- Disabling of userdb/passdb modules using config statements
- Disabling of userdb/passdb modules using config statements
- Disabling of userdb/passdb modules using config statements
- What is the recommended way to move a message from one mailbox to another using CLI