On 03/25/15 13:03, Benny Pedersen wrote:> Brad Smith skrev den 2015-03-25 16:58: >> On 03/25/15 08:46, Peter Chiochetti wrote: >>> Am 25.03.2015 um 13:23 schrieb Nick Edwards: >>>> So there *is* a chance it will be commercialised >>> Hasn't it been commercial for a long time? >> When was the last time you paid for Dovecot? The base product is >> open source and free for anyone to use. > > only paid here by compileing time, still have dovecot v1 working, so > open source it not complete free, as long it compiles fine i am happyNot making any sense. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Brad Smith skrev den 2015-03-25 20:20:>> only paid here by compileing time, still have dovecot v1 working, so >> open source it not complete free, as long it compiles fine i am happy > > Not making any sense.punktum ? if i really need to install precompiled problems i could aswell install windows 10, and be happy, its just not opensource when the sources is not shown, where is the source codes for android ?, its based on linux with is opensource, but where is the source for android ? got my point ? i just say that opensource brands is not really opensource if one install it precompiled, punktum as you write it
Am 25.03.2015 um 20:34 schrieb Benny Pedersen:> Brad Smith skrev den 2015-03-25 20:20: > >>> only paid here by compileing time, still have dovecot v1 working, so >>> open source it not complete free, as long it compiles fine i am happy >> >> Not making any sense. > > punktum ?"only paid here by compileing time" is nonsense> if i really need to install precompiled problems i could aswell install > windows 10, and be happy, its just not opensource when the sources is > not shownfoolish trolling - the source needs to be available or does your self compiled binary show you his source at startup? you can download the source from Redhat, Fedora, OpenSUSE, Debian and so it is shown - you just need to look at it - well, but you don't understand it anyways, no difference to your way of download, unpack and compile a source you don#t understand> where is the source codes for android ?available or where do alternate ROM providers take it> its based on linux with is opensource, but where is > the source for android?https://source.android.com/source/downloading.html> got my point ?as in 98% of your posts you have no point> i just say that opensource brands is not really opensource if one > install it precompiled, punktum as you write itbullshit - there is no difference between install the binary a distribution build from the source tarball than download the tarball and call make scripts until you want change some default flags -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20150325/736ee9c4/attachment.sig>
On 03/25/15 15:34, Benny Pedersen wrote:> Brad Smith skrev den 2015-03-25 20:20: > >>> only paid here by compileing time, still have dovecot v1 working, so >>> open source it not complete free, as long it compiles fine i am happy >> >> Not making any sense. > > punktum ? > > if i really need to install precompiled problems i could aswell install > windows 10, and be happy, its just not opensource when the sources is > not shown, where is the source codes for android ?, its based on linux > with is opensource, but where is the source for android ? > > got my point ? > > i just say that opensource brands is not really opensource if one > install it precompiled, punktum as you write it*shakes head* So many flaws with that logic. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.