dovecot - Jun 2010 - R: Re: R: Re: Dovecot 2.0 shared mailbox using ACLs problem

...something is still wrong.
On the shared folders the commands "select" and "examine"
work only the first
time:
-------%<--------------------------------------------------------
3 select "shared/user1 at pec.inail.gov.it"
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft Junk)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft Junk \*)] Flags 
permitted.
* 6 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UNSEEN 4] First unseen.
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1276393110] UIDs valid
* OK [UIDNEXT 15] Predicted next UID
* OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 7] Highest
3 OK [READ-WRITE] Select completed.
....
3 select "shared/user1 at pec.inail.gov.it"
3 NO Mailbox doesn't exist: shared/user1 at pec.inail.gov.it
-------%<--------------------------------------------------------

>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: p.quidacciolu at libero.it
>Data: 14/06/2010 12.32
>A: <tss at iki.fi>
>Cc: <dovecot at dovecot.org>
>Ogg: R: Re: [Dovecot] R: Re:  Dovecot 2.0 shared mailbox using ACLs problem
>
>Yesterday I have tried the 2.0beta6. It seems to work fine!
>Thanks a lot.
>
>>----Messaggio originale----
>>Da: tss at iki.fi
>>Data: 11/06/2010 17.28
>>A: "p.quidacciolu at libero.it"<p.quidacciolu at
libero.it>
>>Cc: <dovecot at dovecot.org>
>>Ogg: Re: [Dovecot] R: Re:  Dovecot 2.0 shared mailbox using ACLs problem
>>
>>On to, 2010-06-10 at 19:38 +0200, p.quidacciolu at libero.it wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> now I'm able to share/access to the shared mailbox,
>>> but when try to write (as owner) in each mailbox, I catch a 
segfault of
>the 
>>> imap process.
>>> In the next the trace.
>>> I'm using "dovecot-2-0-2d6cf78982dc".
>>
>>Hopefully http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/f37d19f1c0a3 fixes this
>>crash?
>>
>>
>>
>
>

On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 10:42 +0200, p.quidacciolu at libero.it
wrote:
> ...something is still wrong.
> On the shared folders the commands "select" and
"examine" work only the first
> time:
..
> 3 select "shared/user1 at pec.inail.gov.it"
> 3 NO Mailbox doesn't exist: shared/user1 at pec.inail.gov.it
Any way you can reproduce this? For example giving all of the same
commands as client does in a broken session? Or is it related to time
instead? I couldn't break it and I don't have much ideas what could be
causing it..