I either misunderstand the namespace hidden option, or else perhaps it's
not working correctly in 1.0.5?
dovecot.conf
# default namespace
namespace private {
separator = /
prefix inbox = yes
hidden = yes
}
# for backwards compatibility:
namespace private {
separator = .
prefix = INBOX.
inbox = yes
}
Then login and test
s6jh LIST "" "*"
SND: <<< len(939) Comp_len(118) Time:0.137985
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Diary"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Spam"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Sent"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Archive"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Sent Items"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Subdir"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Junk E-mail"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Trash"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Drafts"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Deleted Items"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "INBOX"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.Diary"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.Spam"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.Sent"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.Archive"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.Sent Items"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.Subdir"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.Junk E-mail"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.Trash"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.Drafts"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.Deleted Items"
* LIST (\HasChildren) "." "INBOX"
The idea was to support an old client using Courier like access whilst
still letting new clients access using the normal process
Ed W
Benjamin R. Haskell
2007-Oct-03 18:03 UTC
[Dovecot] Namespace "hidden" option not working?
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Ed W wrote:> I either misunderstand the namespace hidden option, or else perhaps it's not > working correctly in 1.0.5? > > > dovecot.conf > > # default namespace > namespace private { > separator = / > prefix > inbox = yes > hidden = yes > } > > # for backwards compatibility: > namespace private { > separator = . > prefix = INBOX. > inbox = yes > }You shouldn't have inbox = yes on more than one namespace. From the comments in my dovecot.conf: # There can be only one INBOX, and this setting defines which namespace # has it. #inbox = yes I think you're also hiding the wrong namespace. You don't want to advertise the backwards-compatibility namespace to clients. If they're already using the old one, they can still use it, but you don't want new clients to start using it. Namespace-aware clients will adapt (in theory?). Best, Ben