It would be nice for the sake of not conflicting to have the PAM service
name not be imap. Especially as the same service name is used for pop
as well :)
My recommendation would be to use dovecot instead. Any other opinions?
Jeremy
-------------- next part --------------
--- dovecot-0.99.10-rc1/src/auth/passdb-pam.c.servicename 2003-06-23
00:56:22.000000000 -0400
+++ dovecot-0.99.10-rc1/src/auth/passdb-pam.c 2003-06-23 00:56:27.000000000
-0400
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@
static void pam_init(const char *args)
{
- service_name = i_strdup(*args != '\0' ? args : "imap");
+ service_name = i_strdup(*args != '\0' ? args : "dovecot");
to_wait = NULL;
}
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 19:40, Jeremy Katz wrote:> It would be nice for the sake of not conflicting to have the PAM service > name not be imap. Especially as the same service name is used for pop > as well :)I could change it to use imap for imap and pop3 for pop3.> My recommendation would be to use dovecot instead. Any other opinions?Well, I'm not really against that either.