http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.9.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.9.tar.gz.sig I'm still lagging behind in my email, but I guess it's time to release v2.0.9 anyway. - Linux: Fixed a high system CPU usage / high context switch count performance problem - Maildir: Avoid unnecessarily reading dovecot-uidlist while opening mailbox. - Maildir: Fixed renaming child mailboxes when namespace had a prefix. - mdbox: Don't leave partially written messages to mdbox files when aborting saving. - Fixed master user logins when using userdb prefetch - lda: Fixed a crash when trying to send "out of quota" reply - lmtp: If delivering duplicate messages to same user's INBOX, create different GUIDs for them. This helps to avoid duplicate POP3 UIDLs when pop3_uidl_format=%g. - virtual storage: Fixed saving multiple mails in a transaction (e.g. copy multiple messages). - dsync: Saved messages' save-date was set to 1970-01-01. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot-news/attachments/20110113/0a36b97a/attachment.bin
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 01:21:26PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:> > I'm still lagging behind in my email, but I guess it's time to release > v2.0.9 anyway. > > - Linux: Fixed a high system CPU usage / high context switch count > performance problemIs this relevant to RHEL5 kernels (2.6.18-194.32.1.el5), or only bleading edge kernel.org versions? Any idea ? -jf
Am 13.01.2011 12:21, schrieb Timo Sirainen:> I'm still lagging behind in my email, but I guess it's time to release > v2.0.9 anyway. > ... > - Maildir: Fixed renaming child mailboxes when namespace had a prefix.Renaming a mailbox that has children still doesn't work for me with v2.0.9.... Any ideas? . CREATE mailbox . OK Create completed. . CREATE "mailbox/sub mailbox" . OK Create completed. . LIST "" * * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "mailbox" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "mailbox/sub mailbox" . OK List completed. . RENAME mailbox mail-box . NO [SERVERBUG] Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. [2011-01-13 17:48:15] . LIST "" * * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "mail-box" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "mailbox/sub mailbox" . OK List completed. # cat /var/log/mail.err Jan 13 17:48:15 dovecot dovecot: imap(user at do.main): Error: rename(/var/spool/imap/do.main/user/Maildir/.mailbox/sub mailbox, /var/spool/imap/do.main/user/Maildir/.mail-box/sub mailbox) failed: No such file or directory # ls -alF /var/spool/imap/do.main/user/Maildir/ drwx------ 5 vmail vmail 4096 2011-01-13 17:47 .mail-box/ drwx------ 5 vmail vmail 4096 2011-01-13 17:47 .mailbox.sub mailbox/ Holger
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:21:26 +0200, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote:> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.9.tar.gz > I'm still lagging behind in my email, but I guess it's time to release > v2.0.9 anyway. > > - Linux: Fixed a high system CPU usage / high context switch > count performance problemIs this problem also present in Dovecot 1.2.xx ? Regarding critical resources in shared (XEN) servers, like CPU or RAM usage, will v.2.0.9 use more (or less) resources than v.1.2.12? Do you feel that v.2.0.9 is already good enough to use in a shared server to serve less than a 100 users? Best regards, M.
On 13.1.2011, at 19.22, Mark Alan wrote:>> - Linux: Fixed a high system CPU usage / high context switch >> count performance problem > > Is this problem also present in Dovecot 1.2.xx ?No.> Regarding critical resources in shared (XEN) servers, like CPU or RAM > usage, will v.2.0.9 use more (or less) resources than v.1.2.12?About the same I think.> Do you feel that v.2.0.9 is already good enough to use in a > shared server to serve less than a 100 users?Should be fine.
* Mark Alan <varia at e-healthexpert.org>:> > - Linux: Fixed a high system CPU usage / high context switch > > count performance problem > > Is this problem also present in Dovecot 1.2.xx ?No.> Regarding critical resources in shared (XEN) servers, like CPU or RAM > usage, will v.2.0.9 use more (or less) resources than v.1.2.12?The same.> Do you feel that v.2.0.9 is already good enough to use in a > shared server to serve less than a 100 users?If it works for 15k users here, it will probably work for less than a 100 users as well. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Gesch?ftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charit? - Universit?tsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebrandt at charite.de | http://www.charite.de
On Thursday 13 of January 2011 13:21:26 Timo Sirainen wrote:> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.9.tar.gz > http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.9.tar.gz.sig > > I'm still lagging behind in my email, but I guess it's time to release > v2.0.9 anyway.I've noticed that for some unknown reason doc/wiki/LDA.Sieve.txt is "empty" this time despite wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve still has its content. Not that important, just to let you know.
On 1/13/2011 3:21 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.9.tar.gz > http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.9.tar.gz.sig > > I'm still lagging behind in my email, but I guess it's time to release > v2.0.9 anyway. >Yeah! Now just waiting for Pigeonhole to catch up... -- Daniel