I had to update the video plugin interface slightly to fix some bugs. I've attached an updated mplayer patch. -David -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: mplayer-xv-compiz-video-2.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 15198 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/compiz/attachments/20070711/37e301ac/attachment-0001.bin
David Reveman ha scritto:> I had to update the video plugin interface slightly to fix some bugs. > I've attached an updated mplayer patch. > > -DavidThanks... Does it fix the bug (is it a bug?) that didn't allow mplayer-based players (like smplayer/kplayer/kmplayer...) not to use the video plugin (pratically just (g)mplayer did)? However, is there any chance for this to be merged in mplayer code? And again, please, could you do something similar for libxine? I've started something, but I've not so much knowledge... :/ Bye PS: Maybe you'd know but this patch/plugin is quite vital for Mesa DRI users since it allows to have accelerated videos completely working under compiz too. -- Trevi?o's Blog - Life and Linux http://3v1n0.tuxfamily.org/blog/
David Reveman ha scritto:> I've attached an updated mplayer patch. >I've just finished compilig mplayer rc1 patched with this, but now it doesn't work! :( Do maybe I need a newer mplayer version? However I don't have any compilation problem... Any idea? Checking the differencies between this and the past patch I can't find so much data... Wich are the changes exactly? Thanks... -- Trevi?o's Blog - Life and Linux http://3v1n0.tuxfamily.org/blog/
David Reveman wrote:> I had to update the video plugin interface slightly to fix some bugs. > I've attached an updated mplayer patch.Feed the Stupid please.... I remember reading that this plugin is effectively for Xgl? Does this also work for AIGLX? I've got intel i945GM and can't use Xv under compiz, but will enabling the video plugin and applying this patch to mplayer make it magically work? Col
On 7/12/07, David Reveman <davidr at novell.com> wrote:> I had to update the video plugin interface slightly to fix some bugs. > I've attached an updated mplayer patch. >Just to check, since I'm interested in applying this to Ubuntu's mplayer, but this patch is still not ready for upstream mplayer, right? I remember the last such thread ending in "we should probably wait for the retained-mode interface" - do the same comments apply here? In a related question, any news on such an interface? :) Chris Halse Rogers
David Reveman wrote:> I had to update the video plugin interface slightly to fix some bugs. > I've attached an updated mplayer patch.David, Is this patch ever going to make it upstream to mplayer do you think? Has it been submitted/reviewed by upstream devs? Cheers Col
David Reveman wrote:> I had to update the video plugin interface slightly to fix some bugs. > I've attached an updated mplayer patch.It seems to work fine for stand alone mplayer but is anyone else having trouble when using it via mplayerplugin in firefox? I've not rebuilt mplayerplugin but I believe this is not necessary. Col
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 02:10 +0200, Trevi?o wrote:> David Reveman ha scritto: > > I had to update the video plugin interface slightly to fix some bugs. > > I've attached an updated mplayer patch. > > > > -David > Thanks... Does it fix the bug (is it a bug?) that didn't allow > mplayer-based players (like smplayer/kplayer/kmplayer...) not to use the > video plugin (pratically just (g)mplayer did)?Probably not. I haven't tried smplayer/kplayer/kmplayer.> > However, is there any chance for this to be merged in mplayer code? > > And again, please, could you do something similar for libxine? I've > started something, but I've not so much knowledge... :/I'm sure someone else will do this. If not, I might do it some day when I have time.> > Bye > > PS: Maybe you'd know but this patch/plugin is quite vital for Mesa DRI > users since it allows to have accelerated videos completely working > under compiz too.I know. -David
Sam Spilsbury wrote:> I think the reason it doesnt work with the mplayer frontends is because > the frontends tell mplayer which backend to use. > > What is the name of the patched backend?Not as simple as that unfortunately Sam. It patches the xv video out so it's not a new one. I've tried forcing xv output in the frontends but to no avail. So I suspect it's something to do with the frontends giving mplayer a wid to play with is somehow messing things up. Col