On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 4:08 AM Tom Bishop <bishoptf at gmail.com> wrote:> +1 Streams is not for a production workload, if I wanted that I can easily > deploy an Arch instance if I want or need a rolling distro (it's not Redhat > etc but still). If Redhat wanted CentOS to be released near the same time > line they could help make that happen, although that wouldn't be in there > best financial interest.think of it this way ... when the rolling beta is done, the final release will be done with no further delay. -- -john r pierce recycling used bits in santa cruz
On 21/06/20 9:15 am, John Pierce wrote:> On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 4:08 AM Tom Bishop <bishoptf at gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 Streams is not for a production workload, if I wanted that I can easily >> deploy an Arch instance if I want or need a rolling distro (it's not Redhat >> etc but still). If Redhat wanted CentOS to be released near the same time >> line they could help make that happen, although that wouldn't be in there >> best financial interest. > > > think of it this way ... when the rolling beta is done, the final release > will be done with no further delay.No, Stream and the core OS are built form a completely separate set of sources. I highly doubt that we could use binaries built from stream to populate the final release. The whole thing has to be rebuilt for the final release regardless of the status of Stream. Peter
but the build process should be the same, no? I can't believe RH would use a completely different build process for the release than for the beta/development stuff. On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 5:36 PM Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote:> On 21/06/20 9:15 am, John Pierce wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 4:08 AM Tom Bishop <bishoptf at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> +1 Streams is not for a production workload, if I wanted that I can > easily > >> deploy an Arch instance if I want or need a rolling distro (it's not > Redhat > >> etc but still). If Redhat wanted CentOS to be released near the same > time > >> line they could help make that happen, although that wouldn't be in > there > >> best financial interest. > > > > > > think of it this way ... when the rolling beta is done, the final release > > will be done with no further delay. > > No, Stream and the core OS are built form a completely separate set of > sources. I highly doubt that we could use binaries built from stream to > populate the final release. The whole thing has to be rebuilt for the > final release regardless of the status of Stream. > > > Peter > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >-- -john r pierce recycling used bits in santa cruz