CentOS - Sep 2019 - 7.7.1908, interface bonding, and default route

El vie., 20 de sep. de 2019 a la(s) 06:16, Giles Coochey (giles at coochey.net)
escribi?:
> I have a similar set up to you, and just did the upgrade to 1908, I
> didn't experience the problem you had, I can't see anything out of
the
> ordinary in your network files.
>
I have reviewed the configuration several times now, and still can't see if
there's anything wrong with it. What I found is that, after the system has
booted up, if I systemctl restart network the default route does gets
applied.

Thanks a lot for your input!

Am 2019-09-20 15:31, schrieb Carlos A. Carnero Delgado:
> El vie., 20 de sep. de 2019 a la(s) 06:16, Giles Coochey 
> (giles at coochey.net)
> escribi?:
> 
>> I have a similar set up to you, and just did the upgrade to 1908, I
>> didn't experience the problem you had, I can't see anything out
of the
>> ordinary in your network files.
>> 
> 
> I have reviewed the configuration several times now, and still can't 
> see if
> there's anything wrong with it. What I found is that, after the system 
> has
> booted up, if I systemctl restart network the default route does gets
> applied.
> 
> Thanks a lot for your input!
If you don't want to use NetworkManager, then define
NM_CONTROLLED="no"

In case you are using NetworkManager, then follow the RHEL guide to 
setup your bond using nmcli: 
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/networking_guide/sec-network_bonding_using_the_networkmanager_command_line_tool_nmcli

Alexander

El vie., 20 de sep. de 2019 a la(s) 10:03, Alexander Dalloz (
ad+lists at uni-x.org) escribi?:
> If you don't want to use NetworkManager, then define
NM_CONTROLLED="no"
>
And *that* was the answer! Everything is working as expected now.

Thank you!
Carlos.