On May 4, 2018, at 3:03 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote:> > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> >> $ sudo chcon -R -t samba_share_t /path/to/share > > Updated the page as suggested. Thanks.Thanks! I now see another instance of this in section 3. Instead of copying the text verbatim, it should probably be: chcon -R -t samba_share_t /mnt/data ?in order to match the text above it.
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com> wrote:> On May 4, 2018, at 3:03 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com> wrote: >>> >>> $ sudo chcon -R -t samba_share_t /path/to/share >> >> Updated the page as suggested. Thanks. > > Thanks! > > I now see another instance of this in section 3. Instead of copying the text verbatim, it should probably be: > > chcon -R -t samba_share_t /mnt/data > > ?in order to match the text above it.Warren, I was just informed that the chcon command your suggested was originally there, but it was replaced with the 2 line version sometime ago. The reason given was "Replace chcon by semanage/restorecon pair to survive filesystem relabel". What do you think? Akemi
On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 14:55 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com> > wrote: > > On May 4, 2018, at 3:03 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > $ sudo chcon -R -t samba_share_t /path/to/share > > > > > > Updated the page as suggested. Thanks. > > > > Thanks! > > > > I now see another instance of this in section 3. Instead of > > copying the text verbatim, it should probably be: > > > > chcon -R -t samba_share_t /mnt/data > > > > ?in order to match the text above it. > > Warren, > > I was just informed that the chcon command your suggested was > originally there, but it was replaced with the 2 line version > sometime > ago. The reason given was "Replace chcon by semanage/restorecon pair > to survive filesystem relabel".The comment is correct: chcon will not survive a relabel. You need to update the database first (semanage fcontext) and then let a relabel apply the new context. Louis