search for: relabel

the description of the --selinux-relabel option suggests that it perform an immediate relabel, when in fact it may (and probably will) instead simply touch /.autorelabel on the image, which schedules a relabel operation for the next time the image boots. This can be surprising because it results both in an extended initial boot time *and...

This shows which files are being relabelled. Also only use -q (suppress non-error output) when we are not verbose. --- daemon/selinux-relabel.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/selinux-relabel.c b/daemon/selinux-relabel.c index 2f48ee6..e7da42d 100644 --- a/daemon/selinux-relabel.c +++ b/...

...> From: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> > To: Cristian Ciupitu <cristian.ciupitu@yahoo.com> > Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>; libvirt-users <libvirt-users@redhat.com> > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 6:05 PM > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] Stop the relabeling of CD images > > On 08/20/2013 04:19 AM, Cristian Ciupitu wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> >>> To: Cristian Ciupitu <cristian.ciupitu@yahoo.com> >>> Cc: libvirt-users <libvirt-users@redhat.com&gt...

----- Original Message ----- > From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> > To: Cristian Ciupitu <cristian.ciupitu@yahoo.com> > Cc: libvirt-users <libvirt-users@redhat.com> > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 11:24 PM > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] Stop the relabeling of CD images > So maybe this would do it: > > <source file=...> >   <seclabel model='selinux' relabel='no'/> >   <seclabel model='dac' relabel='no'/> > </source> I've just tried it and the SELinux label is not change...

Rewrite the relabel API to read the policy configured in the guest, invoking setfiles (added as part of the appliance, as part of policycoreutils) to relabel the specified root. In case of failure at any point of the process, a touch of .autorelabel in the root is tried as last-attempt measure to do the relabel. Cons...

...is feature, in various private email, IRC, and this long bugzilla thread: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060423 That's not how we should do things. Let's discuss it on the mailing list. ] One thing that virt-customize/virt-sysprep/virt-builder have to do is relabel SELinux guests. What we do at the moment is run: if load_policy && fixfiles restore; then rm -f /.autorelabel else touch /.autorelabel echo '%s: SELinux relabelling failed, will relabel at boot instead.' fi while chrooted into the guest (...

Hi, I'm installing the operating system for my virtual machines from CD images and I would like for libvirtd to stop relabeling the corresponding files.  Since the installation media is no big secret, I have labeled the files with system_u:object_r:public_content_t:s0, but libvirtd keeps changing them to system_u:object_r:svirt_image_t:s0.  It also changes the ownership to qemu:qemu.  This means that I can not make the f...

...ote: > > I'm copying a file into a VM using virt-copy-in - which is great, but the > > file is wrongly labeled. > > How can I fix that? > > Hi Yaniv, > > The easiest thing is to run this after doing the virt-copy-in: > > virt-customize -a disk.img --selinux-relabel > > which will run this code: > > https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/blob/master/ > customize/SELinux_relabel.ml#L27 > > That requires an extra launch of the appliance, so if you were very > concerned about doing this most efficiently then you could do > something...

This implements the --selinux-relabel option for virt-customize, virt-builder and virt-sysprep. There is no need to autorelabel functionality now. Thanks: Stephen Smalley --- builder/Makefile.am | 1 + builder/virt-builder.pod | 20 +++++++++---------- customize/Makefile.am | 2 ++ customize/SELinux_relabel....

...Pino Toscano wrote: > On Tuesday, 6 February 2018 16:40:04 CET Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> When you tell virt-builder to install extra RPMs, this potentially >> looses the SELinux labelling that Anaconda had originally setup. Thus we >> must tell virt-builder to enable SELinux relabelling. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> >> --- >> lib/Sys/Virt/TCK.pm | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/lib/Sys/Virt/TCK.pm b/lib/Sys/Virt/TCK.pm >> index e9da8d2..b39f578 100...

Continuation/rework of: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-May/msg00020.html This is my approach, as I explained here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828952#c4 https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-May/msg00035.html IOW: do not attempt to relabel if the guest is not enforcing, as it is either useless or may fail; few words more are in the comments of patch #3. Pino Toscano (2): mlcustomize: refactor reading from /etc/selinux/config mlcustomize: do not relabel if not enforcing (RHBZ#1828952) Richard W.M. Jones (1): mlcustomize: Refac...

...gt; -rw-rw-r--. 1 ptoscano ptoscano unconfined_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0 0 Sep 24 12:26 /tmp/test > $ mv /tmp/test ~/var/ > $ ls -lZ ~/var/test > -rw-rw-r--. 1 ptoscano ptoscano unconfined_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0 0 Sep 24 12:26 /home/ptoscano/var/test > $ restorecon -v ~/var/test > Relabeled /home/ptoscano/var/test from unconfined_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0 to unconfined_u:object_r:user_home_t:s0 > $ ls -lZ ~/var/test > -rw-rw-r--. 1 ptoscano ptoscano unconfined_u:object_r:user_home_t:s0 0 Sep 24 12:26 /home/ptoscano/var/test That's definitely a weird thing. Bug maybe? &g...

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 05:57:50PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > Do not attempt to relabel a guest in case its SELinux enforcing mode is > not "enforcing", as it is either pointless, or it may fail because of an > invalid policy configured. > --- > mlcustomize/SELinux_relabel.ml | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) &...

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 03:21:45PM -0400, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: > the description of the --selinux-relabel option suggests that it > perform an immediate relabel, when in fact it may (and probably will) > instead simply touch /.autorelabel on the image, which schedules a > relabel operation for the next time the image boots. This can be > surprising because it results both in an extended in...

On 08/19/2013 01:51 PM, Cristian Ciupitu wrote: > Hi, > > I'm installing the operating system for my virtual machines from CD > images and I would like for libvirtd to stop relabeling the > corresponding files. Since the installation media is no big secret, I > have labeled the files with system_u:object_r:public_content_t:s0, but > libvirtd keeps changing them to system_u:object_r:svirt_image_t:s0. It > also changes the ownership to qemu:qemu. This means that...

...virtd is running under prevents it from > > > re-labelling, then TAP devices label failure is just going to be one > > > out of 100's of labelling failures. > > > > > IIUC normally libvirtd would use devices created by itself, so there > > shouldn't be relabeling failures, right? > > Whether or not there are relabeling failures is determined by what > SELinux policy libvirtd is running under. > > > > > > > Either the SELinux policy needs to be changed to allow libvirtd to > > > relabel stuff in the normal manner, or...

...libvirt? > > If the SELinux policy that libvirtd is running under prevents it from > re-labelling, then TAP devices label failure is just going to be one > out of 100's of labelling failures. > IIUC normally libvirtd would use devices created by itself, so there shouldn't be relabeling failures, right? > > Either the SELinux policy needs to be changed to allow libvirtd to > relabel stuff in the normal manner, or you will have to turn off > SELinux support in libvirtd. in /etc/libvirt/qemu.conf via the > param security_driver = "none". If you turn of...

Do SELinux relabelling properly.

On Tuesday 27 May 2014 09:08:27 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:21:59AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Rewrite the relabel API to read the policy configured in the guest, > > invoking setfiles (added as part of the appliance, as part of > > policycoreutils) to relabel the specified root. In case of failure > > at > > any point of the process, a touch of .autorelabel in the root is > > trie...

I have 4000 observations that I need to randomly relabel 1000 times and then calculate the mean of the 1000 values at each of the 4000 points. Any ideas for where to begin? Thanks Kevin -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Random-Relabelling-tp3463100p3463100.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.