m.roth at 5-cent.us
2017-Nov-02 21:18 UTC
[CentOS] low end file server with h/w RAID - recommendations
John R Pierce wrote:> On 11/2/2017 9:21 AM, hw wrote: >> Richard Zimmerman wrote: >>> hw wrote: >>>> Next question: you want RAID, how much storage do you need? Will 4 >>>> or 8 3.5" drives be enough (DO NOT GET crappy 2.5" drives - they're >>>> *much* more expensive than the 3.5" drives, and >smaller disk space. >>>> For the price of a 1TB 2.5", I can get at least a 4TB WD Red. >>> >>> I will second Marks comments here. Yes, 2.5" drive enterprise drives >>> have been an issue. +1 for the WD Red drives, so far 3.5" w/ 2tb and >>> 4tb drives, ZERO issues. I've had good luck with HGST NAS drives too. >>> Unfortunately, that will come to an end soon (With WD owning HGST). >> >> Most servers can fit only 2.5" disks these days.? I keep wondering what >> everyone is doing about storage. > > > 2.5" SAS drives spinning at 10k and 15k RPM are the performance solution > for online storage, like databases and so forth.?? also make more sense > for large arrays of SSDs, as they don't even come in 3.5". ?? With 2.5" > you can pack more disks per U (24-25 2.5" per 2U face, vs 12 3.5" max > per 2U)... more disks == more IOPS. > > 3.5" SATA drives spinning at 5400 and 7200 rpm are the choice for large > capacity bulk 'nearline' storage which is typically sequentially written > once >We have a fair number of SAS 3.5" drives, and yes, 10k or 15k speeds. mark
John R Pierce
2017-Nov-02 21:29 UTC
[CentOS] low end file server with h/w RAID - recommendations
On 11/2/2017 2:18 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:> We have a fair number of SAS 3.5" drives, and yes, 10k or 15k speeds.those are internally 2.5" disks in a 3.5" frame.?? you can't spin a 3.5" disk much faster than 7200 rpm without it coming apart. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
m.roth at 5-cent.us
2017-Nov-02 21:35 UTC
[CentOS] low end file server with h/w RAID - recommendations
John R Pierce wrote:> On 11/2/2017 2:18 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> We have a fair number of SAS 3.5" drives, and yes, 10k or 15k speeds. > > those are internally 2.5" disks in a 3.5" frame.?? you can't spin a 3.5" > disk much faster than 7200 rpm without it coming apart. >Sorry, that's incorrect. I have, sitting here in front of me, a Dell-branded Seagate Cheetah, 600GB (it's a few years old) 15k 3.5" drive. mark