On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:> Hi, Johnny, > > Johnny Hughes wrote: >> I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed >> that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8) to >> the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They have left EL5 and EL6 >> at the ESR level (45.8.0-2). >> >> EL7: >> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0461.html >> >> EL5 and EL6: >> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0459.html >> >> As stated above, I am currently building and testing these, so they are >> not yet released .. just preparing people for the changes. >> > In your testing, you might test the situation I posted yesterday: CentOS > 7.3, current firefox, most recent flash-plugin (1 Mar). In one tab, using > noscript, I enabled youtube and googlevideo. It affected a *separate* > firefox window, opened from the firefox file menu. The video played, and > went to play something else. I closed the tab, which is the *only* place > that youtube was enabled. Instead, it kept playing. I actually shut down > firefox altogether... and it kept playing. It didn't stop until I brought > up firefox again, opened the original tab, and disabled youtube there. > *Then*, and only then, did it stop playing.My only testing makes sure it works like the one in RHEL .. We don't make technical changes to our RPMs. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20170308/87b2e2a9/attachment-0001.sig>
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote:> On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > > Hi, Johnny, > > > > Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed > >> that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8) to > >> the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They have left EL5 and EL6 > >> at the ESR level (45.8.0-2). > >> > >> EL7: > >> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0461.html > >> > >> EL5 and EL6: > >> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0459.html > >> > >> As stated above, I am currently building and testing these, so they are > >> not yet released .. just preparing people for the changes. > >> >Does anyone know if ESR 52.x will eventually be released for CentOS 6? -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu
On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > >> On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> Hi, Johnny, >>> >>> Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed >>>> that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8) to >>>> the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They have left EL5 and EL6 >>>> at the ESR level (45.8.0-2). >>>> >>>> EL7: >>>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0461.html >>>> >>>> EL5 and EL6: >>>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0459.html >>>> >>>> As stated above, I am currently building and testing these, so they are >>>> not yet released .. just preparing people for the changes. >>>> >> > > Does anyone know if ESR 52.x will eventually be released for CentOS 6? > >I am sure it will, certainly when version 45 goes EOL. The variables and content to build it on EL6 are in the current EL7 SRPM, but the EL5 stuff is (understandably, since it is going EOL soon) missing. What I am not sure of is if EL7 will stay on the Current Release for the next update or if it will shift back to ESR. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20170308/8d791682/attachment-0001.sig>