hi everyone just a quickie to devel maybe. I'm looking at some bits: devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? regards, L.
On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote:> devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS > elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 > > isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? > regards,devtoolset-6 is available.
On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote:> On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: >> devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS >> elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 >> >> isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more >> packages? >> regards, > devtoolset-6 is available. >somewhere (semi)officially? where?> _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote:> On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: >> devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS >> elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 >> >> isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more >> packages? >> regards, > devtoolset-6 is available.devtoolset-6-runtime is missing from repo(s) ?> > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 12/19/2016 11:47 AM, lejeczek wrote:> > On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote: >> On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: >>> devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS >>> elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 >>> >>> isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? >>> regards, >> devtoolset-6 is available. > devtoolset-6-runtime is missing from repo(s) ?Looks like it is being made available, but not all there yet. Wait a few days and check again, I guess. I just happened to notice that some devtoolset-6 packages were out there; must not yet be the full set.
On 12/19/2016 01:09 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:> On 12/19/2016 11:47 AM, lejeczek wrote: >> >> devtoolset-6-runtime is missing from repo(s) ? > Looks like it is being made available, but not all there yet. Wait a > few days and check again, I guess. I just happened to notice that > some devtoolset-6 packages were out there; must not yet be the full set.I just successfully installed devtoolset-6 from the repos. Also, there has been a devtoolset-4 update; a yum update should pull in the updated devtoolset-4 packages, and a yum install devtoolset-6 should work for you now (it just did for me).