On 04/04/15 07:16, Always Learning wrote:> On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 21:30 -0400, Digimer wrote: > > >> If you and others believe this to be the case, then form an >> organization and fork CentOS. Or, do as CentOS did in the beginning >> and recompile the RHEL binaries to be binary-compatible and create >> your own OS. >> >> It is the open-source way, and I am not being sarcastic. > Then call it ROSIE, Red Hat Operating System Intentionally ..... I need > a suitable word beginning with 'E' :-) > > Well, now everyone knows the future of Centos. >If you guys have that much of a problem with CentOS/RedHat collaboration, why not just move on things like Debian, arch, Suse etc...
On 4/4/2015 8:10 PM, dE wrote:> > If you guys have that much of a problem with CentOS/RedHat > collaboration, why not just move on things like Debian, arch, Suse etc...they just like to whine. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
On Sat, April 4, 2015 10:12 pm, John R Pierce wrote:> On 4/4/2015 8:10 PM, dE wrote: >> >> If you guys have that much of a problem with CentOS/RedHat >> collaboration, why not just move on things like Debian, arch, Suse >> etc... > > they just like to whine. >Some did move to other systems (even away from Linux totally; somehow many assume choices are Linux only). You will not hear them here anymore. I recognize them on other systems mail lists often. Some still comment (lightly), but not because all of them (us I might say) like to whine. No, just to provide feedback, which is courtesy actually as we gain nothing (but slaps: "you like to whine!"). Don't get me wrong, significant split of my systems are and stay CentOS ;-) Valeri ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 20:12 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:> On 4/4/2015 8:10 PM, dE wrote: > > > > If you guys have that much of a problem with CentOS/RedHat > > collaboration, why not just move on things like Debian, arch, Suse etc... > > they just like to whine.If the *whole* truth had been told to the public (i.e. "us") at the first mention of the RH take-over, including the divergence away from RH versions and the RH dominated management board controlling the now Red Hat owned Centos product, then significant qualities of our time and energy could have been more usefully spent on other things. Reading about C7 problems and systemd, sysctrld etc., I now wish I never threw away (for recycling) my 1990's purchase of a FreeBSD technical manual. Above all, I want stability in a product. Once I have learned increasing amounts of a product, I am adverse to replacing that knowledge with tomorrow's new versions especially if - for me - those alleged "improvements" offer me no beneficial advantage. I like C5 and C6 and hope the BSDs systems are similar. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. Je suis Charlie.