I wasn't paying much attention, but I remember a day or two ago, someone
was complaining about python updates. From the RH alerts...
<snip>
This update fixes the following bug:
* Previously, the dependencies between the Python subpackages were set
erroneously and caused problems with the inclusion of i686 multilib
packages in
the x86_64 channels. After this update, the dependencies have been
resolved and
the Python packages install as expected. (BZ#1033111)
All users of python are advised to upgrade to these updated packages,
which fix
this bug.
---
which I think was explicitly the problem....
mark
On 01/24/2014 08:48 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:> I wasn't paying much attention, but I remember a day or two ago, someone > was complaining about python updates. From the RH alerts... > <snip> > This update fixes the following bug: > > * Previously, the dependencies between the Python subpackages were set > erroneously and caused problems with the inclusion of i686 multilib > packages in > the x86_64 channels. After this update, the dependencies have been > resolved and > the Python packages install as expected. (BZ#1033111) > > All users of python are advised to upgrade to these updated packages, > which fix > this bug. > --- > > which I think was explicitly the problem.... >Not sure what you are asking mark .. but now the correct i686 packages are in our x86_64 repos for CentOS. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20140125/2ac70370/attachment.sig>
On 01/25/2014 02:33 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:> On 01/24/2014 08:48 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I wasn't paying much attention, but I remember a day or two ago, someone >> was complaining about python updates. From the RH alerts... >> <snip> >> This update fixes the following bug: >> >> * Previously, the dependencies between the Python subpackages were set >> erroneously and caused problems with the inclusion of i686 multilib >> packages in >> the x86_64 channels. After this update, the dependencies have been >> resolved and >> the Python packages install as expected. (BZ#1033111) >> >> All users of python are advised to upgrade to these updated packages, >> which fix >> this bug. >> --- >> >> which I think was explicitly the problem.... >> > > Not sure what you are asking mark .. but now the correct i686 packages > are in our x86_64 repos for CentOS. >He is not asking, he remembered "Can't install Python i686 on x86_64 system (centos 6.5)" thread and provided an explanation for the problem in that thread. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant