A new .xxx domain suffix for sexual content is becoming available. If you have a cherished Trade Mark or brand name and do not want relish having your_domain_name.xxx being available to Cyber Squatters or the 'porn trade' you can block the issuing of that .xxx domain name for a single payment of USD $200 - $300. The blocking application period is from 7 September 2011 until 28 October 2011. The details of where to apply were not disclosed. .xxx will cost about USD $75 yearly. Source: Law Now mailing list CMS Cameron McKenna, London, England 19 August 2011. -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU.
Am 21.08.2011 23:11, schrieb Always Learning:> > A new .xxx domain suffix for sexual content is becoming available.Keep that elsewhere! Do not spam this list with non CentOS topics. Thanks. Alexander
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:11:24PM +0100, Always Learning wrote:> > A new .xxx domain suffix for sexual content is becoming available.This has been available for a long time. The important question is why in the world would you spam this list with yet more off-topic garbage? The signal to noise ratio has gone to the dogs over the past 9 months and what used to be a good and viable source for technical information is now a morass of noise more often than not - please don't add to it. John -- There is nothing more agreeable in life than to make peace with the Establishment -- and nothing more corrupting. -- Alan John Percivale (AJP) Taylor (1906-1990), British historian of the 20th Century, "William Cobbett", New Statesman (London, 1953) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110821/95096bb4/attachment-0002.sig>
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
2011-Aug-21 22:48 UTC
[CentOS] .XXX Domain Name / Trade Mark Protection
On 08/21/2011 11:30 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:11:24PM +0100, Always Learning wrote: >> >> A new .xxx domain suffix for sexual content is becoming available. > > This has been available for a long time. > > The important question is why in the world would you spam this list > with yet more off-topic garbage? The signal to noise ratio has gone to > the dogs over the past 9 months and what used to be a good and viable > source for technical information is now a morass of noise more often > than not - please don't add to it.More importantly the address he posted is a law firm and as such cannot really make any sort of guarantees. At best this is false advertising and at worst it's an outright scam. Regards, Dennis
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
- RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
- RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
- RFC: Second draft of an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
- Error in lmer: asMethod(object) : matrix is not symmetric [1, 2]