In a server with raid1 a first smart error was reported.
Smart attributes:
SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED
WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 200 200 051 Pre-fail Always -
0
3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0003 185 183 021 Pre-fail Always -
7750
4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always -
20
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail Always -
0
7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000e 200 200 000 Old_age Always -
0
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 075 075 000 Old_age Always -
18868
10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0012 100 253 000 Old_age Always -
0
11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0012 100 253 000 Old_age Always -
0
12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always -
18
192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always -
10
193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always -
28
194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 121 115 000 Old_age Always -
31
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always -
0
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 200 200 000 Old_age Always -
1
198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0010 200 200 000 Old_age Offline -
0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x003e 200 200 000 Old_age Always -
0
200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0008 200 200 000 Old_age Offline -
0
I assume, raw read error rate is ok. So I would use the same disk for resyncing
the raid.
Other recommendations?
Helmut
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110630/8c3312a3/attachment-0002.html>
