similar to: raid1: solve smart error

On 19/03/18 14:01, Morgan Read wrote: > Hello list > > I've been running the following command, first in fc20 and then now > (since the beginning of March) in fc26: > now=$(date +"%Y%m%d-%H%M"); sudo rsync -ahuAESX -vi /home/ > /run/media/readlegal/Backup/home > > /run/media/readlegal/Backup/rsync-changes_$now > > Since the move to fc26, this

I'm not used to using smartd, but have a new set of systems that don't have any sort of RAID on them, so I enabled smartd (18 systems 4 SATA drives each). Running CentOS 5.4 64-bit .. One of them has emailed me twice(despite it saying it would only email me once) saying it has 1 Offline uncorrectable sectors But when I try to find more information, smartctl seems to think everything is

I've got a 1Tb USB disc that appears to be dying - eg it took about 10 days (!) to run 'badblocks -nsv /dev/sdc' and it only did less than 2% in that time. Read access became _really_ slow. So there's definitely something amiss and I've got it offline. There's no drama about the content as I have other backups and I'm resigned to junking the thing, but I'm curious

I've seen similar cases where a USB drive appears to fail but the SMART reports success. The most recent was a 500 GB disk which had internally a Seagate Barracuda SATA drive. It appeared to work well until I sent it a largish (7GB) tarball. As well as SMART I ran a surface check and exercise, all passed. The tar kept failing. I can't test further, the disk has been broken up for

Il 17/01/2016 19:36, Alessandro Baggi ha scritto: > Il 17/01/2016 18:46, Brandon Vincent ha scritto: >> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Matt Garman >> <matthew.garman at gmail.com> wrote: >>> I'm not sure what's going on with your drive. But if it were mine, >>> I'd want >>> to replace it. If there are issues, that long smart check

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Pyeron > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2015 22:54 > > NOTE: this is happening on Centos 6 x86_64, > 2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.x86_64 not Centos 5 > > Dell PowerEdge 2970, Seagate SATA drive, non-raid. > > I have this server which has been dying randomly, with no logs. Here is a console picture. http://i.imgur.com/ZYHlB82.jpg

I finally fixed my drive error problem. This has been going on quite a while. I've posted before with no success on getting this fixed. I was getting these errors. Dec 4 04:03:10 bikesn4x4s kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Dec 4 04:03:10 bikesn4x4s kernel: hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC } And now for the amazing smartctl -a

Hi all. I have one server with problem in maillog: Feb 6 06:46:26 host1 postfix/qmgr[24296]: fatal: qmgr_move: update active/4DE015AC536 time stamps: Stale NFS file handle Feb 6 06:46:27 host1 postfix/master[4487]: warning: process /usr/libexec/postfix/qmgr pid 24296 exit status 1 Feb 6 06:46:27 host1 postfix/master[4487]: warning: /usr/libexec/postfix/qmgr: bad command startup -- throttling

Hello, I'm running FreeBSD 9.0/amd64, pure ZFS setup, one Seagate disk ST2000NM0011 SN02 on LSI Logic (mpt) controller. Yes, I know that running one disk on RAID controller is a bit weird, I have to find yet if it is possible to connect disk to internal SATA controller. About two days ago, system became SLOW. Disk usage is constantly 100%, and sometimes I'm getting swap_pager:

My wife's box has a very intermittent problem, when booting from the Maxtor IDE hard drive. This has been going on for about 2 1/2 years.... The box is a Compaq EVO D300v for the Enterprise. When it boots, there is a SMART advisory from the BIOS that says failure is immenient. Occasionally, it will not boot, because the BIOS does not see the hard drive. I replaced the EIDE cable, but the

After having massive problems with a supermicro X7DBE box using AOC-SAT2-MV8 Marvell controllers and opensolaris snv79 (same as described here: http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-66-233341-1) we just start over using new hardware and opensolaris 2008.05 upgraded to snv94. We used again a supermicro X7DBE but now with two LSI SAS3081E SAS controllers. And guess what? Now we get

Hey, guys See further below extracted output from a daily scrub showing csum errors on sdb, part of a raid1 btrfs. Looking back, it has been getting errors like this for a few days now. The disk is patently unreliable but smartctl's output implies there are no issues. Is this somehow standard faire for S.M.A.R.T. output? Here are (I think) the important bits of the smartctl output for

Hi All, I am fairly certain that this disk is failing in my server, and I am replacing it straight away anyway. However, I'd appreciate the views of the list just to be sure as I value your opinion(s). I got these errors, once only so far, in /var/log/messages. This disk has / on it. Oct 5 08:34:47 server1 kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x7 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 Oct 5 08:34:47

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Pyeron > Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 0:00 > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason Pyeron > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2015 22:54 > > > > NOTE: this is happening on Centos 6 x86_64, > > 2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.x86_64 not Centos 5 > > > > Dell PowerEdge 2970, Seagate SATA drive,

Hi, Is there a way to tell / narrow down if an issue with errors like below are due to a bad cable or bad port multiplier ? The disks in a particular cage are throwing errors like these below. (RELENG9 from today) siis0 at pci0:5:0:0: class=0x010400 card=0x71241095 chip=0x31241095 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Silicon Image, Inc.' device = 'SiI 3124 PCI-X Serial

Hi All, I know many of us here manage RAID on our Centos based servers so this may be of interest to us all. I ordered three new "Enterprise hard drives" this month from a well known UK online retailer. The drives arrived as new in their anti-static packaging. Before using one of the drives in a mission critical hardware raid I checked the SMART attributes and was amazed at what I

Two days ago I installed a brand new SSDNow E50 series (Enterprise) disk on a server. I intend to move the OS there. I just did the physical install and copied a few files to and from it just to see if it was OK. I left it there, waiting for an opportunity to configure it to do real work. Now I have looked at it with smartctl -a and it gives me the following info: 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate

hi All, I''m new on the list. System: Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 13.04 Release: 13.04 Codename: raring Linux ctu 3.8.0-19-generic #30-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 1 16:35:23 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux The symptom is the same with Saucy 3.9 kernel. ii btrfs-tools 0.20~git20130524~650e656-0daily13~raring1 amd64 Checksumming Copy on

Il 24/10/2016 14:05, Leonard den Ottolander ha scritto: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 12:07 +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === >> SMART Error Log not supported > > I reckon there's a <snip> between those lines. The line right after the > first should read something like: > > SMART overall-health self-assessment

Il 27/10/2016 19:38, Yamaban ha scritto: > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:25, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> Il 24/10/2016 14:05, Leonard den Ottolander ha scritto: >>> On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 12:07 +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>> > === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === >>> > SMART Error Log not supported >>> >>> I reckon there's a