C Linus Hicks
2010-Feb-11 22:05 UTC
[CentOS] xfs_repair doesn't fix sb versionnum missing attr
I run: xfs_check /dev/sdc10 And it reports: sb versionnum missing attr bit 10 Then I run: xfs_repair /dev/sdc10 And it reports output from 7 phases and "done". Again I run: xfs_check /dev/sdc10 And it reports: sb versionnum missing attr bit 10 Is this how it's supposed to work? Thanks for any help. Linus
C Linus Hicks
2010-Feb-12 14:52 UTC
[CentOS] xfs_repair doesn't fix sb versionnum missing attr
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 07:02 -0500, Brent L. Bates wrote:> The first question is did you unmount the file system first before doing > both the xfs_check and xfs_repair? A file system should not be mounted while > doing either of these. xfs_check will give false failures if it is run while > the file system is mounted. If everything was unmounted while you used these > utilities, then may be the disk is failing. At the moment, I don't know what > else to check.The filesystem was not mounted at the time I ran either xfs_check or xfs_repair, and the disk is not failing.
James Pearson
2010-Feb-12 16:52 UTC
[CentOS] xfs_repair doesn't fix sb versionnum missing attr
C Linus Hicks wrote:> I run: > > xfs_check /dev/sdc10 > > And it reports: > > sb versionnum missing attr bit 10 > > Then I run: > > xfs_repair /dev/sdc10 > > And it reports output from 7 phases and "done". > > Again I run: > > xfs_check /dev/sdc10 > > And it reports: > > sb versionnum missing attr bit 10 > > Is this how it's supposed to work?You might have better luck emailing <xfs at oss.sgi.com> - see: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs> James Pearson