Lanny Marcus
2009-May-25 18:43 UTC
[CentOS] {SOLVED} Re: OT: SMART warning on hard drive, same warning for 2 1 /2 years
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Lanny Marcus <lmmailinglists at gmail.com> wrote:> My wife's box has a very intermittent problem, ?when booting from the > Maxtor IDE hard drive. This has been going on for about 2 1/2 > years.... The box is a Compaq EVO D300v for the Enterprise. When it > boots, there is a SMART advisory from the BIOS that says failure is > immenient. Occasionally, it will not boot, because the BIOS does not > see the hard drive. ?I replaced the EIDE cable, but ?the problem ofAfter I posted this yesterday, I turned my wife loose on her computer and it choked. Possibly a coincidence, after receiving SMART warnings for a couple of years, and it was ready to die. Thought I had 2 used hard drives, in perfect condition, but the first one I installed turned out to be DOA and now the other one is installed.. :-) Thanks to everyone who replied. As Mark (MHR) wrote, I too was skeptical of the SMART warnings from the BIOS and when I checked on the Compaq Support site, a couple of years ago, I was told the Compaq BIOS is very sensitive and there are a lot of false warnings. However, after checking the bad hard drive with smartctl yesterday, I am a believer in SMART warnings....
John Doe
2009-May-26 08:38 UTC
[CentOS] {SOLVED} Re: OT: SMART warning on hard drive, same warning for 2 1 /2 years
From: Lanny Marcus <lmmailinglists at gmail.com>> Thanks to everyone who replied. As Mark (MHR) wrote, I too was > skeptical of the SMART warnings from the BIOS and when I checked on > the Compaq Support site, a couple of years ago, I was told the Compaq > BIOS is very sensitive and there are a lot of false warnings. However, > after checking the bad hard drive with smartctl yesterday, I am a > believer in SMART warnings....>From what I understand, there is a "max number of errors allowed" before the warnings appear.This max number is "arbitrary" I guess. In the past, HP bioses had this max number apparently set too low. With firmware updates, the max was raised. So, while you were warned too early, your disk finaly reached the "real" max. JD
Apparently Analagous Threads
- OT: SMART warning on hard drive, same warning for 2 1 /2 years
- "yum update" did not update kernel on one box
- Reinstalled Windows and GRUB - Cannot boot Linux - SOLVED
- OT: Google Earth, v.4.3.7284.3916 (beta) on CentOS 5.2 (32 bit) (SOLVED)
- NOW: Firefox 3.0 and GNOME crash when trying to view SME Server documentation WAS: OT: anything in CentOS 5.2 that uses opendns.com when browsing web?