I've heard now from more than one source about problems with CentOS (and RH) at least up through 5.2 w.r.t. SATA drive handling, and I've even reported on this myself in this list before. My question is, do we have any idea if 5.3 has any improvements in this area? One of my cohorts here, who happens to be a Fedora fan, says that these problems are fixed in F9, but I have grave concerns about putting an enterprise lifeline main application on any Fedora release. If 5.3 solves these issues, I'd much rather go with that. Any ideas? Any places I might look to see for myself? Thanks. mhr
MHR wrote:> I've heard now from more than one source about problems with CentOS > (and RH) at least up through 5.2 w.r.t. SATA drive handling, and I've > even reported on this myself in this list before. > > My question is, do we have any idea if 5.3 has any improvements in this area? >do you have any bug report numbers for these issues ? -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:01 PM, MHR <mhullrich at gmail.com> wrote:> I've heard now from more than one source about problems with CentOS > (and RH) at least up through 5.2 w.r.t. SATA drive handling, and I've > even reported on this myself in this list before. > > My question is, do we have any idea if 5.3 has any improvements in this area? > > One of my cohorts here, who happens to be a Fedora fan, says that > these problems are fixed in F9, but I have grave concerns about > putting an enterprise lifeline main application on any Fedora release. > If 5.3 solves these issues, I'd much rather go with that. > > Any ideas? Any places I might look to see for myself?The only issue I've ever seen has been with the onboard fakeraid stuff more and more vendors seem to be adding. I've been using SATA disks with centos since the early 4.x days without issue, so you have me at a bit of a loss here. I'd say if anything it's due to controller support, and much of that can be chalked up to what hardware vendors are pawning off as 'controllers' these days. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell
MHR wrote:> I've heard now from more than one source about problems > with CentOS > (and RH) at least up through 5.2 w.r.t. SATA drive > handling, and I've > even reported on this myself in this list before. > > My question is, do we have any idea if 5.3 has any > improvements in this area? > > One of my cohorts here, who happens to be a Fedora fan, > says that > these problems are fixed in F9, but I have grave concerns > about > putting an enterprise lifeline main application on any > Fedora release. > If 5.3 solves these issues, I'd much rather go with > that. >You seem to be relying on hearsay and rumor-mongering. Any bug reports you have filed on the CentOS bug tracker?> Any ideas? Any places I might look to see for myself? >You have to install 5.3 beta and test it yourself. Then again if your "alleged problems" only surface in a conversation with your "fedora buddy" you have to have more than your word for it. Comprende? Spike.