I was wondering if the new bind update is going smoothly for those who have done it? I've been a little hesitant to run it yet as the last time forced a bit of time fixing things. I'm trying to plan if I need to have some hours available for this or if it is like most of the time.. just do it and everything's ok. Best, John Hinton
It went smoothly for me but it has only been 24 hrs :-) What were the issues the last update??? I checked the logs, performance and response, with no problems thus far.. -ed- On Feb 8, 2007, at 9:08 AM, John Hinton wrote:> I was wondering if the new bind update is going smoothly for those > who have done it? > > I've been a little hesitant to run it yet as the last time forced a > bit of time fixing things. I'm trying to plan if I need to have > some hours available for this or if it is like most of the time.. > just do it and everything's ok. > > Best, > John Hinton > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
John Hinton wrote:> I was wondering if the new bind update is going smoothly for those who > have done it? > > I've been a little hesitant to run it yet as the last time forced a > bit of time fixing things. I'm trying to plan if I need to have some > hours available for this or if it is like most of the time.. just do > it and everything's ok.I threw caution to the wind and just installed it on our primary and secondary nameserver systems. I didn't run into any problems and it was a simple "yum update" for me. I remember having some issues in the past with systems that were also running a caching nameserver. I've since uninstalled that on systems that were doing real work. Cheers,
> > I was wondering if the new bind update is going smoothly for those who > have done it? > > I've been a little hesitant to run it yet as the last time forced a bit > of time fixing things. I'm trying to plan if I need to have some hours > available for this or if it is like most of the time.. just do it and > everything's ok. > > Best, > John HintonNope. Yet, welcome to roulette with Robert! You have just been ELECTED the first new Bind Guinea Pig of 2007 !!! No offense to any Pot Belly's out there! Simply login to your server and update and let us know how it turns out. :-) ;-> - rh -- Robert - Abba Communications Computer & Internet Services (509) 624-7159 - www.abbacomm.net
John Hinton wrote:> I was wondering if the new bind update is going smoothly for those who > have done it?I've updated both our primaries without any problems. The *problem* which occured with one of the last updates was explicitly fixed in this version (and in the version before that, which only was available via the fasttrack repository). Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070208/48d9606d/attachment.sig>
John Hinton wrote:> I was wondering if the new bind update is going smoothly for those who > have done it? > > I've been a little hesitant to run it yet as the last time forced a bit > of time fixing things. I'm trying to plan if I need to have some hours > available for this or if it is like most of the time.. just do it and > everything's ok. > > Best, > John Hinton >I had one issue -- it changed owners in /var/named which caused the domains I do secondary for to fail to update. I fixed that and it is now doing it's thang... -- -Doc Lincoln, NE. http://www.genealogyforyou.com/ http://www.cairnproductions.com/