Hello list.
I have a mail server where I use Postfix+SASL. Everything works fine.
Sending emails when using client (Outlook, Thunderbird or anything
else) require authorization. It is OK.
But on the same server there is a Squirrelmail which sends emails as a
localhost. To send email in this way there is no any authorization.
Besides one preson use PINE on the server...
How to do that authorization is required when you use Squirrelmail or
PINE (localhost)?
Regards
--
____________________________________________________________________
D o m i n i k S k ? a d a n o w s k i
Dominik Sk?adanowski wrote:> Hello list. > > I have a mail server where I use Postfix+SASL. Everything works fine. > Sending emails when using client (Outlook, Thunderbird or anything > else) require authorization. It is OK. > > But on the same server there is a Squirrelmail which sends emails as a > localhost. To send email in this way there is no any authorization. > Besides one preson use PINE on the server... > > How to do that authorization is required when you use Squirrelmail or > PINE (localhost)? > > Regards > -- > ____________________________________________________________________ > D o m i n i k S k ? a d a n o w s k i > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >I don't know about pine but with squrrelmail run the conf.pl and go to Server Settings / update SMTP Settings / SMTP Authentication that's all leonel
Am Fr, den 03.02.2006 schrieb Dominik Sk?adanowski um 23:57:> I have a mail server where I use Postfix+SASL. Everything works fine. > Sending emails when using client (Outlook, Thunderbird or anything > else) require authorization. It is OK. > > But on the same server there is a Squirrelmail which sends emails as a > localhost. To send email in this way there is no any authorization. > Besides one preson use PINE on the server... > > How to do that authorization is required when you use Squirrelmail or > PINE (localhost)?I am no Squirrelmail user (running horde/IMP myself for several years), but I guess it is not SMTP AUTH by Squirrelmail what you want, but to let webmail users initially auth with Squirrelmail. That is the typical use. If you really want that Squirrelmail has to auth with the local Postfix you have to use SMTP instead of sendmail inside Squirrelmail's configuration (too needed when SELinux is active) and to reconfigure Postfix in main.cf. Typically localhost / 127.0.0.0/8 is part of "mynetworks" and "smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, ...". At least you have to remove "permit_mynetworks" from those smtpd_*_restrictions. Could you please explain what you really want and why? Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp Serendipity 01:22:19 up 61 days, 5:59, load average: 0.11, 0.23, 0.18 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060204/8c79be99/attachment-0002.sig>
Dominik Sk?adanowski wrote:> Hello list. > > I have a mail server where I use Postfix+SASL. Everything works fine. > Sending emails when using client (Outlook, Thunderbird or anything > else) require authorization. It is OK. > > But on the same server there is a Squirrelmail which sends emails as a > localhost. To send email in this way there is no any authorization. > Besides one preson use PINE on the server... > > How to do that authorization is required when you use Squirrelmail or > PINE (localhost)? > > Regards > -- > ____________________________________________________________________ > D o m i n i k S k ? a d a n o w s k iYou would be better served subscribing to the Postfix list. If you want answer that pertain to a subject, why not use the vehicles that are specific to the app you have issues with? Just a thought... -- Best regards, Chris Never create a problem for which you do not have the answer.