Robert P. J. Day
2010-Oct-09 09:58 UTC
[CentOS-docs] but what if i don't care about centos 4?
absolutely serious question -- i appreciate that it's important to still document how things are done in centos 4, but i have precisely zero interest in that. given how long centos 5 has been out, and that centos 6 is not that far down the road given the alleged release schedule for RHEL 6 (rumoured end of year), i plan on investing my time in centos 5 and 6 exclusively. so while i'm more than happy to write/update docs, i won't be spending any time whatsoever with centos 4. so what does one do under those circumstances? again, this is a perfectly serious question. i know it's not fair to short-change centos 4 -- i just have no interest in it. rday -- =======================================================================Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ========================================================================
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 05:58 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:> so while i'm more than happy to write/update docs, i won't be > spending any time whatsoever with centos 4. so what does one do under > those circumstances? again, this is a perfectly serious question. i > know it's not fair to short-change centos 4 -- i just have no interest > in it. > > rday--- Perhaps it bit you or something or rubbed you the wrong way? Ohh, CentOS 4 is getting jealous already. Where's the love? John
Ralph Angenendt
2010-Oct-10 18:38 UTC
[CentOS-docs] but what if i don't care about centos 4?
Am 09.10.10 11:58, schrieb Robert P. J. Day:> so while i'm more than happy to write/update docs, i won't be > spending any time whatsoever with centos 4. so what does one do under > those circumstances?a) If there already is a page describing CentOS 4 and CentOS 5 uses a different approach: Keep the content as is, mark it as "This is how to do it in 4" and then add a "And this is how to do it in 5" section. b) If there is no page describing things for 4, and 5 uses a different approach: Add documentation for 5 and clearly state on the page, that this is (probably) only valid on 5. c) If both use the same approach: Nothing to do there, maybe a short mention that it can be used on both. When 6 comes out, the same approach seems to be doable. Regards, Ralph