CentOS docs - Jun 2010 - Removal of "CentOS Errata" from Newsletter 1004

Dear all,

On 06/07/2010 09:00 AM, noreply at centos.org wrote:
> The following page has been changed by GeerdDietgerHoffmann:
> http://wiki.centos.org/Newsletter/1004?action=diff&rev2=11&rev1=10
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> - ||<tablestyle="float:
right;">[[ImageLink(TimothyLee/TimothyLee96.png,TimothyLee,alt=Timothy
Lee,width=48)]]||
> - == CentOS Errata => - ''This section highlights the most
severe security updates for each supported CentOS release, whilst providing a
summary and short links to the reference of the security issue.''
> -
> - === CentOS-3 ==> -  * ''No critical updates were released in
May 2010.''
> -
> - === CentOS-4 ==> -  * ''No critical updates were released in
May 2010.''
> -
> - === CentOS-5 ==> -  * The release of
[:Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.5:CentOS 5.5]
> -
Just wondering why the "Errata" section was removed?  Its content is 
up-to-date, and does serve to inform readers that there have been no 
critical updates since the last newsletter was issued.

Of course, the final decision rests with the editorial team.

Regards,
Timothy

Hi.
> On 06/07/2010 09:00 AM, noreply at centos.org wrote:
>> The following page has been changed by GeerdDietgerHoffmann:
>>
http://wiki.centos.org/Newsletter/1004?action=diff&rev2=11&rev1=10
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> - ||<tablestyle="float:
right;">[[ImageLink(TimothyLee/TimothyLee96.png,TimothyLee,alt=Timothy
Lee,width=48)]]||
>> - == CentOS Errata =>> - ''This section highlights the
most severe security updates for each supported CentOS release, whilst providing
a summary and short links to the reference of the security issue.''
>> -
>> - === CentOS-3 ==>> - ?* ''No critical updates were
released in May 2010.''
>> -
>> - === CentOS-4 ==>> - ?* ''No critical updates were
released in May 2010.''
>> -
>> - === CentOS-5 ==>> - ?* The release of
[:Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.5:CentOS 5.5]
>> -
> Just wondering why the "Errata" section was removed? ?Its content
is
> up-to-date, and does serve to inform readers that there have been no
> critical updates since the last newsletter was issued.
>
> Of course, the final decision rests with the editorial team.
Cannot imagine any good reason for removing them. Didi, was it just a mistake?

As you are an editor you are part of the 'editorial team', too :)

Best Regards
Marcus

Hey

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Timothy Lee <timothy.ty.lee at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Just wondering why the "Errata" section was removed? ?Its content
is
> up-to-date, and does serve to inform readers that there have been no
> critical updates since the last newsletter was issued.
>
> Of course, the final decision rests with the editorial team.
I am ever so sorry. I though it was not updated and I didn't want
"stale" data in the Newsletter. Thank you soo much for reporting this,
I will put it back right away.

Cheers Didi
-- 
Hoffmann Geerd-Dietger
http://contact.ribalba.de