This deadlock comes from xfstests 251.
We''ll hold the chunk_mutex throughout the whole of a chunk allocation.
But if we find that we''ve used up system chunk space, we need to
allocate a
new system chunk, but this will lead to a recursion of chunk allocation and end
up with a deadlock on chunk_mutex.
So instead we need to allocate the system chunk first if we find we''re
in ENOSPC.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 37e0a80..0793ddc 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -3396,6 +3396,39 @@ static int should_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_root *root,
return 1;
}
+static void check_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
+ struct btrfs_root *root, int check)
+{
+ struct btrfs_space_info *info;
+ u64 left;
+ u64 thresh;
+ u64 num_dev = 0;
+
+ info = __find_space_info(root->fs_info, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM);
+ spin_lock(&info->lock);
+ left = info->total_bytes - info->bytes_used - info->bytes_pinned -
+ info->bytes_reserved - info->bytes_readonly;
+ spin_unlock(&info->lock);
+
+ mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
+ num_dev = root->fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices;
+ mutex_unlock(&root->fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
+
+ thresh = btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(root, num_dev + 1);
+ if (left < thresh && btrfs_test_opt(root, ENOSPC_DEBUG))
+ dump_space_info(info, 0, 0);
+
+ if (check)
+ return;
+
+ if (left < thresh) {
+ u64 flags;
+
+ flags = btrfs_get_alloc_profile(root->fs_info->chunk_root, 0);
+ btrfs_alloc_chunk(trans, root, flags);
+ }
+}
+
static int do_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *extent_root, u64 alloc_bytes,
u64 flags, int force)
@@ -3468,6 +3501,12 @@ again:
force_metadata_allocation(fs_info);
}
+ /*
+ * Check if we have enough space in SYSTEM chunk because we may need
+ * to update devices.
+ */
+ check_system_chunk(trans, extent_root, 0);
+
ret = btrfs_alloc_chunk(trans, extent_root, flags);
if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOSPC)
goto out;
--
1.6.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Andrea Gelmini
2012-Mar-15 15:08 UTC
Re: [PATCH v2] Btrfs: fix deadlock during allocating chunks
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:17:09PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:> This deadlock comes from xfstests 251. > > We''ll hold the chunk_mutex throughout the whole of a chunk allocation. > But if we find that we''ve used up system chunk space, we need to allocate a > new system chunk, but this will lead to a recursion of chunk allocation and end > up with a deadlock on chunk_mutex. > So instead we need to allocate the system chunk first if we find we''re in ENOSPC.I''m using this patch without problem since you published it (compressed /home with hourly snapshot delete/creation). Thanks a lot for your work, Andrea -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html