Hi Chris-
This pull misses the clone reservation fix again... :)
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg11826.html
Thanks!
sage
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Chris Mason wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The for-linus branch of the btrfs tree on github:
>
> Head commit: a66e7cc626f42de6c745963fe0d807518fa49d39
> git://github.com/chrismason/linux.git for-linus
>
> Has the following fixes. for-linus is against rc6, since some of these
> are regression fixes for earlier 3.1 btrfs commits. The most important
> of the bunch is Josef''s dentry fix, which avoids enoents if we
race with
> multiple procs hitting on the same inode. This bug is btrfs-specific,
> it came in with his optimization to cache the inode location during
> readdir.
>
> Li Zefan (3) commits (+9/-5):
> Btrfs: don''t make a file partly checksummed through file clone
(+5/-0)
> Btrfs: don''t change inode flag of the dest clone file (+0/-1)
> Btrfs: fix pages truncation in btrfs_ioctl_clone() (+4/-4)
>
> Josef Bacik (1) commits (+11/-2):
> Btrfs: only clear the need lookup flag after the dentry is setup
>
> Jeff Liu (1) commits (+7/-2):
> BTRFS: Fix lseek return value for error
>
> Hidetoshi Seto (1) commits (+3/-2):
> btrfs: fix d_off in the first dirent
>
> Total: (6) commits (+30/-11)
>
> fs/btrfs/file.c | 9 +++++++--
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>